Atchison, T. & SF Ry. Co. v. Francom
Decision Date | 10 April 1941 |
Docket Number | No. 9632.,9632. |
Citation | 118 F.2d 712 |
Parties | ATCHISON, T. & S. F. RY. CO. et al. v. FRANCOM et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Robert Brennan, Leo E. Sievert, and H. K. Lockwood, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.
Delamere F. McCloskey, Russell D. Hardy, and Marion P. Betty, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.
Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.
This is an appeal from a judgment against appellants, defendants below, in favor of appellees, plaintiffs below, adjudging that plaintiffs "have and recover of and from the defendants, The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a corporation, Hugh A. Donahue and E. F. Abril, the sum of Thirty-five Thousand Dollars ($35,000.00), together with costs herein taxed at $69.60."
The complaint by the parties now appellees, from which the judgment arose, alleges the following tortious conduct of the appellants and damages proximately caused thereby:
Appellees filed this complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles. On the petition of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a Kansas corporation, the cause was removed by order of that court to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division. A motion to remand was made by the plaintiffs on the ground that plaintiffs were citizens and residents of the State of California and the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Arenas v. United States
...Mayes, 10 Cir., 1930, 43 F.2d 521; Lion Mfg. Corp. v. Chicago Flexible Shaft Co., 7 Cir., 1939, 106 F.2d 930; Atchison, Topeka & S. F. Co. v. Francom, 9 Cir., 1941, 118 F.2d 712. 30 35 C.J.S., Federal Courts, § 11; Mullen v. Fitz Simons & Connell Dredge & Dock Co., 7 Cir., 1949, 172 F.2d 60......
-
Associated Press v. Emmett
...by challenging the jurisdiction of the court into which he had come for relief. Soon after, another case arose, Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Francom, 9 Cir., 1941, 118 F.2d 712. This was an action for damages for death, begun in the Superior Court for Los Angeles County, California, again......
-
Finn v. American Fire & Casualty Co.
...just. In my opinion, the other cases cited by the majority do not sustain, they oppose, the majority position. In Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Francom, 9 Cir., 118 F.2d 712, a case presenting this same situation was expressly reversed for a new trial. The case of Interstate Refineries v.......
-
Jacobs v. United States
...to federal court, and lost, successfully raised lack of jurisdiction); see Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(h)(3). See also Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. v. Francom, 118 F.2d 712 (9th Cir. 1941); Kataoka v. May Dept. Stores Co., 115 F.2d 521 (9th Cir. 1940); Yankwich, Jurisdiction of the Federal District Courts......