B. FERNANDEZ & HNOS., S. EN C. v. Rickert Rice Mills, Inc.
Decision Date | 08 May 1941 |
Docket Number | No. 3619.,3619. |
Citation | 119 F.2d 809 |
Parties | B. FERNANDEZ & HNOS., S. EN C., v. RICKERT RICE MILLS, Inc. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit |
L. E. Dubon, of San Juan, P. R. (Dubon & Ochoteco and Otero Suro & Otero Suro, all of San Juan, P. R., on the brief), for appellant.
Walter L. Newsom, Jr., of San Juan, P. R. (Henri Brown, of San Juan, P. R., on the brief), for appellee.
Before MAGRUDER and MAHONEY, Circuit Judges, and PETERS, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court of the United States for Puerto Rico for the plaintiff in the sum of $4,250 with interest.
The action arises out of a written contract for the purchase and sale of rice entered into September 25, 1939, between the plaintiff, Rickert Rice Mills, Inc., hereinafter called the seller, a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Louisiana, with its principal offices located in the City of New Orleans in that State, and the defendant, B. Fernandez & Hermanos, Sucesores, S. en C., hereinafter called the buyer, a limited partnership organized under the laws of Puerto Rico, with its principal offices in San Juan.
The form of contract used was the standard Puerto Rican contract of the Rice Millers' Association, which has been used since August 1, 1932. The relevant portions of the contract are as follows:
This space Quantity 100-1b Sample Numbers Price C.I.F. Grades for Seller's double pkts. (Sacks inc.) Variety Memorandum Brands 1,000 single EXTRA FANCY Etc cotton bags ARKANSAS JAPAN $4.25 Clean Rice rice coated R.M.A. — Certificate to be final as to quality grade and conditions. Delivery C.I.F. — San Juan, P.R Time of Shipment. — First half November. — Primera quince noviembre.1
* * *
(over)
On the reverse of this Contract, the following appears
* * *
"(m) The printed terms of this contract may not be varied, altered, or amended under any condition." (Italics supplied.)
The lower court made findings of fact and conclusions of law which may be summarized as follows:
The seller shipped certain rice by steamer November 4, 1940, which duly arrived in San Juan. Immediately after the discharge of the rice from the ship it was examined by the buyer. The latter thereupon notified the seller in writing that it refused to accept or pay for the rice which had been shipped because it was "Fancy Japan" rice and not "Extra Fancy Japan" rice as had been ordered, and that therefore it was not bound to accept and pay for it. The certificate of the Rice Millers' Association which was furnished by the seller pursuant to the contract showed the grade of the rice shipped to be "Fancy Japan Milled Rice" which is a grade inferior to "Extra Fancy Japan" rice.
The seller maintained that even though the Rice Millers' Association certificate showed the rice shipped to be of an inferior grade or quality, the buyer was required by the contract to submit to arbitration the question of the difference in value between the rice ordered and that shipped. If the difference were one-fifth of a cent per pound or less, the seller claimed that the buyer had to accept it at the allowance made. On the other hand, the buyer insisted that the contract made the certificate of the Rice Millers' Association conclusive and that the contract did not require it to submit the question of difference in value to arbitration or to accept an inferior grade of goods at an...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sloan v. Journal Pub. Co.
...the final judge of his own jurisdiction must be clear and unequivocal before it will be given effect. B. Fernandez and Hnos., S. En. C. v. Rickert Rice Mills, Inc., 1 Cir., 119 F.2d 809; Simons v. Publishers' Association of New York City, Sup., 94 N.Y.S.2d 362; Finsilver, Still & Moss, Inc.......
-
United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior and Gulf Navigation Company
...256;3 Mercantile Trust Co. v. Hensey, 205 U.S. 298, 309, 27 S.Ct. 535, 539, 51 L.Ed. 811.4 See also Fernandez & Hnos. v. Rickert Rice Mills, 1 Cir., 119 F.2d 809, 815, 136 A.L.R. 351;5 Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 N.Y. 284, 299, 169 N.E. 386, 391;6 Continental Milling & Feed Co. ......
-
NEW BEDFORD DEFENSE PRODUCTS DIV. v. LOCAL NO. 1113
...than for a conclusive and binding ruling of law not subject to judicial inquiry or review. B. Fernandez & Hnos, S. En C., v. Rickert Rice Mills, Inc., 1 Cir., 119 F.2d 809, 815, 136 A.L.R. 351; Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. United Casualty Co., 1 Cir., 142 F.2d 390, We are thus ......
-
Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. United States
...35 S.Ct. 540, 59 L.Ed. 829 (1915); Callahan Constr. Co. v. United States, 91 Ct.Cl. 538, 634 (1940); Fernandez v. Rickert Rice Mills, 119 F.2d 809, 817, 136 A.L.R. 351 (1st Cir. 1941). 1 As originally issued on December 9, 1952, Item 10 of the specification read in Suitable opening with sub......