Armour & Company v. COMPANIA ARGENTINA DE NAV. D., SA
| Decision Date | 04 February 1959 |
| Docket Number | No. 90,Docket 25056.,90 |
| Citation | 1959 AMC 938,263 F.2d 323 |
| Parties | ARMOUR & COMPANY, Libelant-Appellee, v. COMPANIA ARGENTINA DE NAVEGACION DODERO, S.A., Respondent-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Donald B. Allen, of Hill, Betts & Nash, New York City, for respondent-appellant.
F. Herbert Prem, of Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City, for libelant-appellee.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, MOORE, Circuit Judge, and GIBSON, District Judge.
On this appeal respondent challenges only certain findings of fact of the trial court, made as a part of a reasoned opinion. Such findings may be upset only if clearly erroneous. F.R. 52 (a); McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20; A. H. Bull S.S. Co. v. The Exanthia, 2 Cir., 234 F.2d 650, 653; Schroeder Bros., Inc. v. The Saturnia, 2 Cir., 226 F.2d 147, 149; Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. United States, 2 Cir., 200 F.2d 908, 910. And we find each of them supported by ample evidence.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Levatino Company v. American President Lines, Ltd.
...Lorentzen, 160 F.2d 173, 175 (2 Cir. 1947); Armour & Co. v. Compania Argentina de Nav. Dodero, 1958 A.M.C. 332 (SDNY 1957), aff'd 263 F.2d 323 (2 Cir. 1959); The San Guglielmo, 241 F. 969 (SDNY IX. The 17 inch snowstorm and resulting road conditions which prevented libellant's trucks from c......
-
KONFORT, SA v. The SS Santa Cerro
...while in respondent's custody. Armour & Co. v. Compania Argentina De Navegacion Dodero, S. A., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 1958 A.M.C. 332, affirmed 2 Cir., 263 F.2d 323. But, in my opinion, sea water was the principal cause of the wetting the coils of wire received while in respondent's custody. That wa......