Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Wheeler
Decision Date | 27 September 1929 |
Docket Number | No. 8472.,8472. |
Parties | FIDELITY & DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND v. WHEELER. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Harley H. Stipp, of Des Moines, Iowa, (Eugene D. Perry, Robert J. Bannister, Vincent Starzinger, Fred A. Little, and Donald D. Holdoegel, all of Des Moines, Iowa, on the brief), for appellant.
William G. Harvison, of Des Moines, Iowa, for appellee.
Before KENYON and VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judges, and MARTINEAU, District Judge.
George Youngberg, operating as the Youngberg Construction Company, prior to the 12th day of July, 1924, was engaged, under various contracts, in the construction of roads, bridges, viaducts, and culverts in North and South Dakota. The Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland was surety on Youngberg's construction bonds, guaranteeing the performance of his contracts. Youngberg became financially embarassed, and a number of his creditors sued his surety, the plaintiff in this action. W. W. Wheeler, the defendant below, claimed to be the principal creditor of Youngberg. Plaintiff, the Fidelity & Deposit Company, asserted that Wheeler was in fact a partner of Youngberg operating as the Youngberg Construction Company, and that he, for that reason, was bound for the debts of Youngberg and to indemnify it against liability to Youngberg's creditors. Wheeler denied that he was a partner and that he was liable for Youngberg's debts. With matters in this condition, on July 12, 1924, for the purpose of settling their dispute the Fidelity & Deposit Company and W. W. Wheeler entered into the following contract:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Benward v. Automobile Ins. Co.
...45 S.Ct. 30, 69 L.Ed. 253; United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 315 U.S. 289, 299, 62 S.Ct. 581, 86 L.Ed. 855; Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Wheeler, 8 Cir., 34 F.2d 892-895; Union Central Life Insurance Co. v. Imsland, 8 Cir., 91 F.2d 365-370; Coleman v. Eyre, 45 N.Y. 38; Tradesmen's Nat. B......
-
Walsh v. Schafer., 673.
...that the evidence fully justified the judgment. Affirmed. 1O'Conhor v. Shapiro, 56 App.D.C. 351, 13 F.2d 957; Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Wheeler 8 Cir., 34 F.2d 892; cf. Mitchell v. David, D.C.Mun.App., 51 A.2d 375. 2J. W. Paxson Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 3 Cir., 201 F.......