In re Virginia & Truckee Ry.
Decision Date | 06 January 1941 |
Docket Number | No. H-204.,H-204. |
Citation | 36 F. Supp. 119 |
Parties | In re VIRGINIA & TRUCKEE RY. et al. BIGELOW v. ANDERSON et al. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Nevada |
Duncan A. McLeod, of San Francisco, Cal., and Walter Rowson, of Reno, Nev., for Receiver.
Lloyd V. Smith and John S. Field, both of Reno, Nev., for defendants.
This proceeding was instituted by the above named receiver upon a petition requesting instructions in respect to the claimed authority and rights of defendants in respect to employees of said Railway and Transit Corporations engaged in operating freight motor trucks and passenger, mail and express motor busses upon the public highways, and for a restraining order pending hearing upon application for temporary injunction. A restraining order was issued upon the petition. Defendants appeared by filing a notice of motion for an order dissolving and vacating the temporary restraining order. The motion was denied and a temporary injunction issued. Defendants filed an answer to the petition and the matter submitted upon hearing held thereon.
The answer, among other matters, alleges:
The main question of law presented upon the hearing was in respect to the contention upon the part of the receiver that the employees in both the freight trucking service and the motor transit bus service came within the said Railway Labor Act, while the contention upon the part of defendants was as above stated in their answer. The main controversy was in respect to the trucking operations. No question was raised in respect to both operations being engaged in interstate commerce.
The first section of the Railway Labor Act, Tit. 45 U.S.C.A. § 151, contains the following provision: "The term `carrier' includes any express company, sleeping-car company, carrier by railroad, subject to chapter 1 of Title 49, and any company which is directly or indirectly owned or controlled by or under common control with any carrier by railroad and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Anderson v. Bigelow
...which are conditions precedent to the right of rail carrier employees to strike were satisfied. The district court, In re Virginia & Truckee Ry., 36 F.Supp. 119, 121, arrived at its conclusion that the Railway Labor Act is applicable in the following "The `Motor Carrier Act,' Title 49 U.S. ......