Bache & Co. v. International Controls Corp., No. 202

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM
Citation469 F.2d 696
PartiesBACHE & CO., INCORPORATED, Appellee-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL CONTROLS CORPORATION, Appellant-Appellee.
Decision Date15 December 1972
Docket NumberDocket 72-1454.,No. 202

469 F.2d 696 (1972)

BACHE & CO., INCORPORATED, Appellee-Appellant,
v.
INTERNATIONAL CONTROLS CORPORATION, Appellant-Appellee.

No. 202, Docket 72-1454.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued December 11, 1972.

Decided December 15, 1972.


Howard T. Milman, Sullivan & Cromwell, Joel M. Miller, New York City, for appellee-appellant.

James A. Hourihan, Washington, D. C. (Hogan & Hartson, David A. Ludtke, Washington, D. C., Cahill, Gordon, Sonnett, Reindel & Ohl, David R. Hyde, Allen S. Joslyn, New York City, on the brief), for appellant-appellee.

Before KAUFMAN, ANDERSON and OAKES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM :

We affirm the judgment on Judge Levet's opinions below, 339 F.Supp. 341 (S.D.N.Y.1972) ; 324 F.Supp. 998 (S.D. N.Y.1971).

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 practice notes
  • American Nat. Bank and Trust Co. of Chicago v. Weyerhaeuser Co., Nos. 81-2620
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • October 26, 1982
    ...to the sale of goods). See Bache & Co. v. International Controls Corp., 339 F.Supp. 341, 349 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd on opinion below, 469 F.2d 696 (2d Cir. 1974). Page 468 ILL.REV.STAT. ch. 26, Sec. 2-706(1) (1981), provides that a seller may, upon the buyer's wrongful refusal to accept delivery......
  • Vista Co. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., No. 89 CIV 2813 (LBS).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • December 6, 1989
    ...for the benefit of the individual partners. See Bache & Co. v. Int'l Controls Corp., 324 F.Supp. 998, 1004-05 (S.D. N.Y.1971), aff'd, 469 F.2d 696 (2d Cir.1972) (Broker in whose name contract was made could bring action on behalf of customers under Rule 17(a). "The law wisely does not requi......
  • Primavera Familienstifung v. Askin, No. 95 Civ. 8905(RWS).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • February 5, 2001
    ...price minus resale proceeds. N.Y. U.C.C. § 2-706(1); see Bache & Co. v. Int'l Controls Corp., 339 F.Supp. 341, 349 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 469 F.2d 696 (2d Cir. This leaves the 8 securities not sold by March 31, and which were later sold by DLJ at prices that were lower than the amounts credited......
  • Metzner v. DH Blair & Co., No. 87 Civ. 1560 (KC).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • June 22, 1988
    ...requirements of most tender offers." Bache & Co. v. International Controls Corp., 324 F.Supp. 998, 1004 (S.D.N.Y.1971), aff'd per curiam, 469 F.2d 696 (2d Cir.1972). There are no allegations in the current pleading of any tender offer being made. The count must be dismissed.735 F.2d 15, 23 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
18 cases
  • American Nat. Bank and Trust Co. of Chicago v. Weyerhaeuser Co., Nos. 81-2620
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • October 26, 1982
    ...to the sale of goods). See Bache & Co. v. International Controls Corp., 339 F.Supp. 341, 349 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd on opinion below, 469 F.2d 696 (2d Cir. 1974). Page 468 ILL.REV.STAT. ch. 26, Sec. 2-706(1) (1981), provides that a seller may, upon the buyer's wrongful refusal to accept delivery......
  • Vista Co. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., No. 89 CIV 2813 (LBS).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • December 6, 1989
    ...for the benefit of the individual partners. See Bache & Co. v. Int'l Controls Corp., 324 F.Supp. 998, 1004-05 (S.D. N.Y.1971), aff'd, 469 F.2d 696 (2d Cir.1972) (Broker in whose name contract was made could bring action on behalf of customers under Rule 17(a). "The law wisely does not requi......
  • Primavera Familienstifung v. Askin, No. 95 Civ. 8905(RWS).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • February 5, 2001
    ...price minus resale proceeds. N.Y. U.C.C. § 2-706(1); see Bache & Co. v. Int'l Controls Corp., 339 F.Supp. 341, 349 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 469 F.2d 696 (2d Cir. This leaves the 8 securities not sold by March 31, and which were later sold by DLJ at prices that were lower than the amounts credited......
  • Metzner v. DH Blair & Co., No. 87 Civ. 1560 (KC).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • June 22, 1988
    ...requirements of most tender offers." Bache & Co. v. International Controls Corp., 324 F.Supp. 998, 1004 (S.D.N.Y.1971), aff'd per curiam, 469 F.2d 696 (2d Cir.1972). There are no allegations in the current pleading of any tender offer being made. The count must be dismissed.735 F.2d 15, 23 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT