Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Allen
Decision Date | 13 September 1924 |
Docket Number | No. 6438.,6438. |
Citation | 2 F.2d 566,40 ALR 1389 |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Parties | PRAIRIE OIL & GAS CO. et al. v. ALLEN. |
W. P. Z. German, of Tulsa, Okl. (T. J. Flannelly and Paul B. Mason, both of Independence, Kan., and Alvin F. Molony and Cliff V. Peery, both of Tulsa, Okl., on the brief), for plaintiffs in error.
L. K. Pounders, of Bristow, Okl., for defendant in error.
Before STONE and LEWIS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, District Judge.
This action was originally brought in the state court by Lizzie Allen against the Prairie Oil & Gas Company, hereinafter called Prairie Company, to recover damages for alleged conversion of a quantity of petroleum oil. It was properly removed to the federal court. Thereafter, Skelly Oil Company, hereinafter called Skelly Company, on motion of Prairie Company, was made a party defendant.
The parties by written stipulation waived a trial by jury and set forth an agreed statement of facts and an agreed statement of what certain witnesses would testify to, subject to the right to move to strike any part thereof on legal grounds. From this stipulation the following facts appear:
On May 9, 1911, the Good Land Company executed and delivered to J. C. Trout its deed, the material portions of which are as follows:
On November 21, 1912, J. C. Trout and Rozella Trout, executed and delivered to Lizzie Allen their deed to the above-described property conveyed by Good Land Company to J. C. Trout.
Thereafter Good Land Company entered into a so-called assignment and contract with the Kay-Wagoner Oil & Gas Company, hereinafter called Kay-Wagoner Company, which in part reads as follows:
Thereafter Kay-Wagoner Company executed and delivered an assignment thereof to Skelly Company, which, after reciting and describing the instrument between Good Land Company and Kay-Wagoner Company, and referring to it as a lease, in part, reads as follows:
"Now, therefore, for and in consideration of one dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable considerations, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned, the said Kay-Wagoner Oil & Gas Company, as the present owner of said lease and all rights thereunder, or incident thereto, does hereby bargain, sell, transfer, assign and convey unto Skelly Oil Company, * * * its successors and assigns, an undivided three-fourths (¾) interest in said lease and in the oil and gas leasehold estate created, granted and evidenced thereby, and in all rights thereunder or incident thereto. * * *"
The deeds and other instruments above referred to, shortly after the respective dates of their execution, were duly recorded.
At the time of the assignment from Kay-Wagoner Company to Skelly Company, it was agreed that Skelly Company should have the operation, management and development of the premises for oil and gas.
On June 15, 1920, Skelly Company peaceably entered upon the land and took possession of sufficient of the surface to enable it to proceed with the development thereof for oil and gas. On June 17, 1920, Skelly Company commenced the drilling of an oil well thereon and completed the same July 12, 1920, as a producing oil well. Thereafter it drilled two additional wells. It completed the last one February 9, 1921. From July 12, 1920, to the date of the trial it continuously produced oil from the premises in paying quantities. The reasonable and necessary expenditures of Skelly Company in the development and operation of the property up to and including February 1, 1922, amounted to $153,880.40. Skelly Company continued to operate the property from February 1, 1922, to the date of the trial (April 13, 1922), and incurred and paid the necessary expenses of such operation, but the items at the time of the trial had not been posted on Skelly Company's books.
On August 4, 1920, Skelly Company contracted with Prairie Company to sell the latter the oil produced from well No. 1, and from wells that might thereafter be drilled on the land, and in pursuance thereof a divisional order was executed by the Good Land Company, Kay-Wagoner Company, and Skelly Company, which directed the Prairie Company to give credit for oil received from such wells, as follows: Good Land Company 15 per cent. royalty interest; Kay-Wagoner Company 18.75 per cent. working interest; Skelly Company 66.25 per cent. working interest. The 66.25 per cent. working interest credited to Skelly Company included the 10 per cent. belonging to Lizzie Allen.
The oil produced and delivered to Prairie Company was as follows: To May 13, 1921, 25,284.71 barrels, of the market value of $57,586.82; from May 13, 1921, to April 7, 1922, 19,252.02 barrels, of the market value of $27,371.98. All oil run prior to May 13, 1921, was paid to the persons and in the proportions designated in the divisional order. One-tenth of the purchase price of all oil run after May 13, 1921, was retained by the Prairie Company.
Skelly Company, in taking possession of the land and developing the same, did not hold adversely to Lizzie Allen, but recognized that she owned the surface and one-tenth of the oil and gas.
The possession by Skelly Company, the development and operation of the property for oil and gas, the production of oil therefrom and the disposal of the same to the Prairie Company were with the full knowledge of Lizzie Allen.
On September 23, 1920, one Annie Miller filed a suit in the district court of Creek county, Okl., against Lizzie Allen, Skelly Company, and others, wherein she sought to recover the land, claiming that she was the allottee thereof, and that a conveyance made by her in 1905 through which Lizzie Allen, Skelly Company, and Good Land Company claimed title to the same, was void. On October 11, 1920, Lizzie Allen solicited Skelly Company to represent her through its attorney in conjunction with the representation of itself in the defense of this suit. Skelly Company complied with the request, filed a joint answer in behalf of itself and Lizzie Allen, and successfully defended the suit.
On February 25, 1921, Lizzie Allen procured W. W. Croom to write a letter to ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Arbesman v. Winer
...right in the property held by the lessor, and makes the lessee a tenant in common with the other owners. Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Allen, 8 Cir. [1924], 2 F.2d 566, 40 A.L.R. 1389. Likewise, one colessor cannot terminate the lease as to the interests of the other colessors, if the notice to ......
-
Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. U.S. Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Wash.
...Pardee & Curtin Lumber Co., 40 W.Va. 564, 21 S.E. 878 (1895), and the operation of mines, quarries, and oil wells, Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Allen, 2 F.2d 566 (8th Cir. 1924); Cascaden v. Dunbar, 191 F. 471 (9th Cir. 1911); McCord v. Oakland Quicksilver Mining Co., 64 Cal. 134, 27 P. 863 (18......
-
M.L. Johnson Family Props., LLC v. Zinke
...the common property for oil and gas and for that purpose may drill wells and erect necessary plants.") (quoting Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Allen , 2 F.2d 566, 571 (8th Cir. 1924) ); New Domain Oil & Gas Co. v. McKinney , 188 Ky. 183, 221 S.W. 245, 250 (Ky. Ct. App. 1920) ("The right of one co......
-
United States v. Adamant Co.
...Rev. 230; Note, Oil and Gas Interests as "Securities", 1938, 26 Cal. Law Rev. 359; Note, Rights of Cotenants Inter Se as to Oil and Gas, Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Allen, 2 F.2d 566, 40 A.L.R. 1400; Earp v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp., 167 Okl. 86, 27 P.2d 855, 91 A.L.R. By its very nature,......
-
CHAPTER 10 TITLE TO SEVERED MINERALS: A MARKETING PERSPECTIVE
...(Fla. App. 1968); see also 4A R. Powell & P. Rohan, The Law of Real Property ¶ 604 (1982). [36] See, e.g., Prarie Oil & Gas Co. v. Allen, 2 F.2d 566 (8th Cir. 1924); Annot. 49 A.L.R. 2d 797 (1956) (effect of lease granted by less than all cotenants). [37] See Restatement of Property § 138 (......
-
CHAPTER 4 ACQUIRING SEISMIC DATA - AGREEMENTS WITH LAND OR LEASE OWNERS, CONTRACTING FOR SEISMIC DATA OR SERVICES
...& Gas Agreements: The Exploration Phase) 3-1, 3-6--3-8 (May 20-21, 2004) [hereafter "Trowbridge"]. [19] Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Allen, 2 F.2d 566 (8th Cir. 1924); Burnham v. Hardy Oil Co., 147 S.W.2d 330 (Tex. 1912); Byrom v. Pendley, 717 S.W.2d 602 (Tex. 1986); Wilson v. The Superior Oil ......
-
CHAPTER 3 EXPLORATION AGREEMENTS: ACQUIRING GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL DATA
...but reserves to the lessor the authority to permit third party surveys. [57] .See text associated with n.2-5, supra. [58] .Ibid. [59] .2 F.2d 566 (8th Cir. 1924). [60] .Id. at 573. [61] .167 Okla. 86, 27 P.2d 855 (Okla. 1933). [62] .Id., 167 Okla. at 95. [63] .Id. at 93. [64] .See Owen L. A......
-
CHAPTER 11 RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN CO-OWNERS IN MARKETING NATURAL GAS
...Contract Area ***." (Emphasis added.) [*] See, e.g., White v. Smythe, 147 Tex. 272, 214 S.W.2d 967 (1948); Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Allen, 2 F.2d 566 (8th Cir. Okla. 1924). [45b] United Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. Premier Resources, Ltd., 511 F.Supp. 127, 70 O&GR 53 (W.D.Okla. 1980); Ber......