Crescent Lumber & Shingle Company v. Rotherum, 14994.
| Decision Date | 25 January 1955 |
| Docket Number | No. 14994.,14994. |
| Parties | CRESCENT LUMBER & SHINGLE COMPANY, Appellant, v. J. C. ROTHERUM and R. W. Anders, jointly and severally, as individuals and as partners in the firm of J. C. Rotherum Lumber Company, a partnership, Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Wm. Madden Hill, Dallas, Tex., Ungerman, Hill & Ungerman, Dallas, Tex., for appellant.
No appearance for appellee.
Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, HOLMES, Circuit Judge, and ALLRED, District Judge.
Appellant, a Washington corporation, sued defendants, resident citizens of Texas, upon a sworn account1 for materials (lumber) furnished in the amount of $2,767.45, and $500 alleged to be reasonable attorney's fees. The trial court dismissed the complaint for want of jurisdiction, on the theory that the attorney's fees were not recoverable, and therefore the amount in controversy did not exceed $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs. This was error.
Article 2226, Vernon's Civil Statutes, as amended Acts 1953, 53rd Leg., p. 101, ch. 67, § 1, clearly provides for recovery of reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to the claim and costs, on valid claims for, among other things, materials furnished, or suits founded upon on a sworn account or accounts.2 This right to reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to the claim and costs, is a liability properly enforceable in a federal court, to be included in determining the amount in controversy. Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Jones, 290 U.S. 199, 54 S.Ct. 133, 78 L.Ed. 267.
Reversed.
1 Under Rule 185, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, formerly Art. 3736, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes.
2 As originally enacted the amount of attorney's fees was limited to $20 but this limitation was removed by amendment in 1949. The 1953 amendment added "or suits founded upon a sworn account or accounts."
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
DeLorenzo v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
...amount requirement. Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Jones, 290 U.S. 199, 54 S.Ct. 133, 78 L.Ed. 267 (1933); Crescent Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Rotherum, 218 F.2d 638 (5th Cir. 1955). 3 This statute allows the Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. to sue or be sued in the State or Federal courts. Of cour......
-
Peacock & Peacock, Inc. v. Stuyvesant Insurance Company
...7, 9 (8 Cir. 1938), additional opinion 99 F.2d 856, cert. denied 306 U.S. 637, 59 S.Ct. 485, 83 L.Ed. 1038; Crescent Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Rotherum, 218 F.2d 638, 639 (5 Cir. 1955); Stokes v. Reeves, 245 F.2d 700, 702 (9 Cir. 1957); Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Bierman, supra, p. 578 of ......
-
Corrosion Rectifying Co. v. Freeport Sulphur Co.
...58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188. This issue of attorney's fee appears "substantive" for Erie purposes. Crescent Lumber & Shingle Co. v. J. C. Rotherum Lumber Co., 5 Cir., 1955, 218 F.2d 638. This reference to Texas law includes its conflict of laws rules as well as other laws. Klaxon Co. v. Ste......
-
Singleton v. Vance County Bd. of Ed.
... ... 2 See Crescent ... Lumber & Shingle Company v. Rotherman, 218 ... ...