Burnham v. S&L Sawmill, Inc., 489P13.
| Citation | 752 S.E.2d 474 |
| Case Date | December 18, 2013 |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina |
752 S.E.2d 474
Nicholas BURNHAM
v.
S & L SAWMILL, INC., Randy D. Miller Lumber Company, Inc., and Randy D. Miller, Janet B. Miller, and Ryan Miller, Individually and as officers and sole owners of the corporation.
No. 489P13.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec. 18, 2013.
William Benjamin Smith, Charlotte, for Burnham, Nicholas.
Seth M. Bernanke, Charlotte, for Burnham, Nicholas.
Kenneth R. Raynor, Charlotte, for S & L Sawmill, Inc., et al.
Ned A. Stiles, Charlotte, for McGee Brothers Co., Inc.
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 30th of October 2013 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A–31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
[752 S.E.2d 475]
“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of December 2013.”
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Blackmon v. Tri-Arc Food Sys., Inc., COA15–721.
...339, 342–43 (1992), and Burnham v. S & L Sawmill, Inc., 229 N.C.App. 334, 340, 749 S.E.2d 75, 80, disc. review denied, 367 N.C. 281, 752 S.E.2d 474 (2013) (internal quotation omitted)). Plaintiff contends that defendant failed to exercise reasonable care for the safety of its customers, on ......
-
Asher v. Huneycutt
...Inc. , 229 N.C. App. 334, 340, 749 S.E.2d 75, 80 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted), disc. review denied , 367 N.C. 281, 752 S.E.2d 474 (2013) ; see also Harris v. Tri-Arc Food Sys. Inc. , 165 N.C. App. 495, 500, 598 S.E.2d 644, 648, disc. review denied , 359 N.C. 188, 607 S.E.......
-
Novack v. Kosciuszko
...marks omitted); accord Burnham v. S&L Sawmill, Inc. , 229 N.C. App. 334, 340, 749 S.E.2d 75, 80, disc. review denied , 367 N.C. 281, 752 S.E.2d 474 (2013).The duty to warn a lawful visitor depends upon the obviousness of the hazard or condition. When determining whether a condition is obvio......
-
Asher v. Huneycutt
...Inc., 229 N.C.App. 334, 340, 749 S.E.2d 75, 80 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted), disc. review denied, 367 N.C. 281, 752 S.E.2d 474 (2013); see also Harris v. Tri-Arc Food Sys. Inc., 165 N.C.App. 495, 500, 598 S.E.2d 644, 648, disc. review denied, 359 N.C. 188, 607 S.E.2d 270 ......