PUGET SOUND TUG & BARGE COMPANY v. United States, Civ. No. 7704.

Decision Date20 May 1969
Docket NumberCiv. No. 7704.
Citation1969 AMC 1962,305 F. Supp. 570
CourtU.S. District Court — Western District of Washington
PartiesPUGET SOUND TUG & BARGE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, as Owner of the SS LINDENWOOD VICTORY, Official No. 248278, Defendant.

Martin P. Detels, Jr., of Detels, Draper & Marinkovich, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff.

Eugene G. Cushing, U. S. Atty., Luzerne E. Hufford, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Seattle, Wash.; John F. Meadows, Attorney in Charge, Admiralty & Shipping Section, Frederick F. Burgess, Jr., Atty., Admiralty and Shipping Section, U. S. Dept. of Justice, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

BEEKS, District Judge.

This case involves a collision between a tug, the THOR, and the vessel it was assisting, the LINDENWOOD VICTORY. Plaintiff, bareboat charterer of the THOR, brought suit to recover the cost of raising and repairing its tug; as subrogee of the loss sustained by an independent compass adjuster who was on the tug at the time of the casualty which was paid by plaintiff; and for damages for detention. Defendant, owner of the towed vessel, counterclaimed for damages sustained by its vessel. The facts of the case, which are largely undisputed, are as follows:

Plaintiff was requested to provide the services of a tug to assist the LINDENWOOD VICTORY from the inner berth at Pier 91, West, to Pier 90, Berth 6, in Seattle. Plaintiff dispatched its tug RETRIEVER. Upon reporting alongside the LINDENWOOD VICTORY the RETRIEVER was requested by the pilot of the LINDENWOOD VICTORY to radio plaintiff for a second tug. Enter THOR. The pilot of the LINDENWOOD VICTORY directed the RETRIEVER to make up on the port bow, and the THOR to make up a single towline on the stern. The lines of the two tugs were passed aboard the LINDENWOOD VICTORY and made fast by the ship's crew, the THOR's line being placed over a bollard on the port stern of the tow. No explicit mention of whether the engine of the LINDENWOOD VICTORY would be used in the maneuver was made by personnel of any of the three vessels.

The LINDENWOOD VICTORY was unberthed without event, and successfully maneuvered past the vessels moored astern at the outer berths of Pier 91 to a position where its stem was some distance southerly of the south faces of Piers 90 and 91. During this period, and until the casualty, the only engine order signal given by the LINDENWOOD VICTORY to the THOR was for the THOR to tow astern.

When she cleared the outer end of Pier 91 the LINDENWOOD VICTORY's engine was ordered slow astern. Some four minutes thereafter, at approximately 1423, the engine was ordered half astern. No signals were given to the tugs that the engine was being used. The THOR's own "prop wash" prevented her crew from realizing that the LINDENWOOD VICTORY's engine was being used. At about the same time the engine was ordered half astern the RETRIEVER was directed to shift from the port bow to the starboard bow to straighten the LINDENWOOD VICTORY for entry to Pier 90, and she began to do so.

At this time the THOR was pulling dead astern on a short towline of some sixty to seventy feet. At about 1424, having seen the RETRIEVER's changed position, the THOR changed course toward the southwest quadrant, to port of the axis of travel of the LINDENWOOD VICTORY, to assist in straightening her for entry to Pier 90. The THOR's maneuver was entirely proper in the circumstances, but it did not alter the LINDENWOOD VICTORY's axis of travel because her engine was being used, and she began to overrun the THOR. Realizing that the THOR was in difficulty, the pilot of the LINDENWOOD VICTORY ordered the engine stopped at approximately 1424. At...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Houma Well Service, Inc. v. Tug Capt. O'Brien, Civ. A. No. 66-883.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • 17 Abril 1970
    ...A.M.C. 2776. The mutual fault rule was also applied when the tug and its tow collided in Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co. v. S. S. Lindenwood Victory, W.D.Wash.1969, 305 F.Supp. 570, 1969 A.M.C. 1962. But the doctrine of mutual fault has not been applied in those towage cases where the tug clear......
  • Matter of Ta Chi Navigation (Panama) Corp., SA, Civ. A. No. 75-2735
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • 30 Marzo 1981
    ...cost of defense rather than damages. Calzavaro v. Moran Towing & Transportation, 1941 AMC 1299 (S.D.N.Y.1941), Pudget Sound Tug & Barge Co. v. USA, 1969 AMC 1962 (W.D. Wash.1969). We find this to be a valid distinction and therefore deny recovery for this C. A claim in the amount of $603,20......
  • U.S. v. Joyce
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 18 Noviembre 1974
    ...and, under the divided damages rule, the United States was required to pay the owners of the Thor $28,553.46. Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co. v. United States, 305 F.Supp. 570 (W.D.Wash.1969). The United States instituted this indemnity action against Joyce to recover the amount it was required......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT