Wrigley v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
Decision Date | 15 March 1974 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 19348. |
Parties | Norman J. WRIGLEY, Jr., Plaintiff, v. DUN & BRADSTREET, INC., a Delaware corporation. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia |
Charles O. Baird, Jr., Hugh G. Head, Jr. and Kathleen Kessler, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff.
Hugh M. Dorsey, Jr. and W. Rhett Tanner (Hansell, Post, Brandon & Dorsey), Atlanta, Ga., for defendant.
This is an action brought by Mr. Wrigley against Dun & Bradstreet pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., for damages he allegedly incurred as a result of Dun & Bradstreet's issuance of a credit report which contained information on Mr. Wrigley's criminal convictions and the adjudication of bankruptcy of Wrigley Sales, Inc. The action is presently before the Court on Dun & Bradstreet's motion for summary judgment and Mr. Wrigley's motion to strike Dun & Bradstreet's first defense.
Dun & Bradstreet's motion for summary judgment is predicated on the proposition that the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which applies only to "consumer reporting," is not applicable to the facts of this case. Dun & Bradstreet points out that the credit report which forms the factual foundation for this action was issued by Dun & Bradstreet on Wrigley Construction Co. to enable Dun & Bradstreet subscribers to evaluate the risk in extending commercial credit to the Wrigley Construction Co. Dun & Bradstreet concludes that this credit report was not a "consumer" report and that the Fair Credit Reporting Act, therefore, does not apply. Furthermore, Dun & Bradstreet notes that Mr. Wrigley does not complain of a loss of personal (consumer) credit. Wrigley instead seeks damages for the loss of credit to his construction business, Wrigley Construction Co.
The Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U. S.C. § 1681 et seq., was enacted "to insure that consumer reporting agencies exercise their grave responsibilities with fairness, impartiality, and a respect for the consumer's right to privacy" and "to require that consumer reporting agencies adopt reasonable procedures for meeting the needs of commerce for . . . information in a manner which is fair and equitable to the consumer . . . ." 15 U.S.C. § 1681. As can be easily seen from the preceding quote, the Act applies only to "consumer reports." The Act defines "consumer reports" as:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Grigoryan v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.
...from the use of the credit report solely for a commercial transaction”), aff'd, 112 F.3d 98 (2d Cir.1997) ; Wrigley v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., 375 F.Supp. 969, 970–971 (N.D.Ga.1974) (“The court is constrained to the view that both the legislative history of the Act and the official administ......
-
Rasor v. Retail Credit Co.
...(C.D.Cal.1973). Other decisions construing § 1681a(d) are distinguishable from the present case on their facts. Wrigley v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., 375 F.Supp. 969 (N.D.Ga.1974) (credit report issued on construction company in connection with extension of commercial credit only); Sizemore v.......
-
Emerson v. J. F. Shea Co.
... ... 76 Cal.App.3d 579 ... Robert M. EMERSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, ... J. F. SHEA CO., INC., d. b. a. Century Community Developers, Defendant and Respondent ... Civ. 39210 ... Court of ... v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. (1965) 62 Cal.2d 412, 42 Cal.Rptr. 449, 398 P.2d 785, as follows: "A majority of other ... 2 above.) (§ 1681a(d); Wrigley v ... Page 181 ... Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. (N.D.Ga.1974) 375 F.Supp. 969, 970; Sizemore v ... ...
-
Krumholz v. TRW, Inc.
...in response to a request based on plaintiff's application for business credit, was not governed by the FCRA. Wrigley v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., 375 F.Supp. 969 (N.D.Ga.), aff'd 500 F.2d 1183 (5 Cir. 1974); Sizemore v. Bambi Leasing Corp., 360 F.Supp. 252 (N.D.Ga.1973); Fernandez v. Retail C......