Ashe v. Southern Ry. Co.
Decision Date | 07 July 1916 |
Docket Number | 9447. |
Citation | 89 S.E. 482,104 S.C. 414 |
Parties | ASHE v. SOUTHERN RY. CO. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Lancaster County; H. F Rice, Judge.
Action by W. N. Ashe against the Southern Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed.
See also, 100 S.C. 187, 84 S.E. 716.
McDonald & McDonald, of Winnsboro, and B. L. Abney, of Columbia, for appellant.
Dunlap & Dunlap and J. Harry Foster, all of Rock Hill, for respondent.
This is an action for damages for the unlawful ejectment of a passenger. The respondent states his case as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Green v. Atlanta & C. A. L. R. Co.
...... . . The. complaint sets out that, prior to and on February 27, 1922,. the plaintiff was employed by the defendant Southern Railway. Company as a yard conductor, and was placed at work in its. yards at Hayne on the line of the defendant Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line ... granted. Crews v. Sweet, 125 S.C. 303, 118 S.E. 613,. 29 A. L. R. 43; Green v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., . 136 S.C. 337, 134 S.E. 385; Ashe v. Southern R. Co., . 104 S.C. 414, 89 S.E. 482; Templeton v. Charleston & W. C. R. Co., 117 S.C. 44, 108 S.E. 363. And, where more. than one ......
-
Hall v. Southern Ry. Co.
......Boston, etc., R. Co. 179 Mass. 52, 60 N.E. 486; Hauk v. New York, etc., R. Co., 34. A.D. 434, 54 N.Y.S. 248; Benson v. Manhattan R. Co., . 31 Misc. 723, 65 N.Y.S. 271. Since under the well-recognized. rule ( Hutchison v. Southern Railway Company, 109. S.C. 94, 95 S.E. 181, Ashe v. Southern Railway. Company, 104 S.C. 414, 89 S.E. 482) it is the duty of. the court, in considering whether a motion for a direction of. a verdict should be granted, to consider the evidence in the. light most favorable to the plaintiff, for the purpose of. this appeal it must be conceded ......
-
Leitner v. Columbia Ry., Gas & Elec. Co.
...... regard to conflict raised by defendant's evidence, is. [are] to be considered.". . . In. Ashe v. Railway Co., 104 S.C. 414, 89 S.E. 482, we. find (quoting syllabus):. . . "On defendant's motions for a nonsuit and for a. directed ... appeared to him that he was going to do so.". . . The. court cites the case of Cable Piano Co. v. Southern R. Co., 94 S.C. 143, 77 S.E. 868, and quotes with approval. from that case:. . . "As there was nothing to indicate that the driver of the. ......