Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Walton
Decision Date | 10 October 1938 |
Docket Number | No. 4369.,4369. |
Parties | CHESAPEAKE & O. RY. CO. et al. v. WALTON. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
Before NORTHCOTT and SOPER, Circuit Judges.
Charles Clark, of Washington, D. C. (M. Carter Hall, of Richmond, Va., D. Lynch Younger and John C. Donnally, both of Washington, D. C., W. H. T. Loyall, of Norfolk, Va., Lucian H. Cocke, of Roanoke, Va., R. T. Wilson, of Petersburg, Va., and W. N. McGehee, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellants.
Arthur L. Winn, Jr., of Washington, D. C. (Benj. J. Brooks, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellee.
The carriers in this case demurred to the petition of the shipper who sought a judgment against them for certain sums of money which they had been directed by the Interstate Commerce Commission to pay to the shipper as reparations on account of unreasonable rates charged for the transportation of certain merchandise. The ground of the demurrer was that the petition was not filed within one year from the date of the reparation order as required by Section 16 of the Interstate Commerce Act as amended, 49 U.S.C.A. § 16. The demurrer was overruled by the District Judge, and the carriers declining to plead further, judgment was rendered against them for the amounts claimed.
The question involved turns upon the interpretation of the statute which is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
JOINT COUNCIL, ETC. v. Delaware, L. & WR Co.
...do I join in the earlier part. 1 Defendant relies upon Acheson Graphite Co. v. Mellon, D.C.W.D.N.Y., 21 F.2d 562, and Chesapeake & O. R. Co. v. Walton, 4 Cir., 99 F.2d 270; but these decisions actually sustain delayed actions to enforce reparations orders under the Interstate Commerce Act §......
- Irvine v. Helvering
-
Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Austin
...prior to that time, the one-year period commenced on that date. That is the "date of the order." § 16(3) (f). Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Walton, 4 Cir., 1938, 99 F.2d 270; Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. Davis, D.C.N.D.Cal.1925, 6 F.2d 236; Acheson Graphite Co. v. Mellon, D.C.N.Y.1927, 21 F.2d ......
-
Carothers v. Western Transp. Co.
...the date of entry of the order. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Austin, 292 F.2d 415, 418-419 (5th Cir. 1961); Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Walton, 99 F.2d 270, 272 (4th Cir. 1938). Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Co. v. Illinois Terminal Co., 88 F.2d 459 (7th Cir. 1937), was a suit by a carrier agai......