Barton v. CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN TRANSP., No. 1-99-2285.
Court | United States Appellate Court of Illinois |
Citation | 258 Ill.Dec. 844,757 N.E.2d 533,325 Ill. App.3d 1005 |
Docket Number | No. 1-99-2285. |
Parties | Rachel BARTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHICAGO AND NORTH WESTERN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, n/k/a The Union Pacific Railroad Company, and Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation, Defendants-Appellants. |
Decision Date | 14 September 2001 |
757 N.E.2d 533
325 Ill. App.3d 1005
258 Ill.Dec. 844
v.
CHICAGO AND NORTH WESTERN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, n/k/a The Union Pacific Railroad Company, and Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation, Defendants-Appellants
No. 1-99-2285.
Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division.
September 14, 2001.
Clifford Law Offices, Chicago (Robert A. Clifford, Kevin P. Durkin, David A. Novoselsky, Kevin M. Forde, Robert C. Sheridan and Leslie J. Rosen, of counsel), for Appellee.
Presiding Justice CAMPBELL delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiff Rachel Barton filed suit against defendants Chicago & North Western Transportation Company, n/k/a the Union Pacific Railroad Company (CNW)1, and the Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation (NIRCRC), alleging that she was dragged by a train because defendants did not have a proper procedure to determine whether a passenger was caught in the train's doors before leaving a station.2 Following a jury trial in the circuit court of Cook County, defendants were found liable to plaintiff on the claims brought against each of them. The trial court denied defendants' post-trial motions. Defendants timely filed a Notice of Appeal to this court.
The record on appeal discloses the following facts. NIRCRC is a corporation maintained, supervised and directed by the Commuter Rail Board (CRB), the governing body of the Commuter Rail Division (CRD) of the Regional Transportation Agency (RTA) under the RTA Act. See 70 ILCS 3615/2.20(a)(xii), 3B.01, 3B.02 (West 2000). Defendants' brief states that "[t]he CRD/NIRCRC are known to the public through the service mark `Metra.'"3
The CRB may provide public transportation by operating facilities or through purchase of service agreements (PSAs)
"1. SAFETY
The Contract Services shall be operated or provided by [CNW] in accordance with the applicable standards of safety established by any agency of the Federal Government or the State of Illinois, and any other standards established by the [RTA] pursuant to Section 2.04 of this Agreement. [CNW] shall maintain its existing practices and procedures * * * for the safety of its passengers, employees and property used in providing the Contract Services * * *."
Article IV, section 4.01 of the PSA states in part that CNW is an independent contractor for the CRD, and shall have managerial control with respect to the Contract Services. The PSA was in effect through December 31, 1998.
Plaintiff Rachel Barton, born in October 1974, began playing the violin when she was three and a half years old. By the time she was 11 years old, Barton was practicing eight hours daily and had joined the Civic Orchestra in Chicago, which trained people to be concert masters in professional orchestras. When Barton was a teenager, she would go dancing on Friday and Saturday nights; she began dating at age 14. Barton engaged in local, national and international violin competitions. Barton paid her living and musical expenses and would travel alone. When Barton's instruction ended at age 17, she spent more time with friends and family. She hoped eventually to get married and have children.
At age 18, Barton had left the Civic Orchestra and was playing with the Grant Park Symphony and the Lyric Opera Orchestra, as well as substituting for ill members of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra. Barton began giving violin lessons at the Music Center of the North Shore in Winnetka (MCNS). Barton's compact disc of Spanish classical music was released at the end of 1994.
On January 16, 1995, at 10:30 a.m., Barton boarded the last car of CNW northbound train No. 317 at the Ravenswood stop in Chicago. She was going to teach at MCNS. Barton was wearing jeans, a T-shirt, possibly a flannel shirt, a bulky sweater with shoulder pads, a puffy down coat with fashion shoulder pads, gym shoes, earmuffs and thin leather gloves.
Barton was carrying a book bag, her purse and a food bag. Barton also was carrying a violin in a "cushy case" that insulated it from the cold. The violin was loaned to Barton by her patron and insured in the amount of $500,000.4 Barton testified that she was carrying these items on her shoulder. According to Barton, these items would not slip down her shoulder, due to the puffiness of her coat. Barton stated that she routinely carried her items in the following order: purse, violin, book bag, food bag.
During the trip, Barton removed her gloves and worked on student reports.
Barton testified that her purse, violin case, briefcase and food bag were all on her left shoulder. As she tried to descend the stairs, the violin case became caught on one or two poles in the vestibule. According to Barton, while she tried to keep her belongings at her side, the violin case had "jostled sort of in back of" her. Barton stated that she took a step back, reorganized her belongings, descended the stairs and stepped off the train.
As Barton stepped onto the platform, she could hear "ambient train noise." Barton testified that she did not see or hear the train doors close, but felt and heard a bump. Barton attempted to take another step, but was unable to complete it. Barton thought that her violin case had become caught again. Barton testified that it was as if her left shoulder was pinned to the train. Barton could not turn to the right, so she began to turn to the left. Barton stated that she was bowed backwards because her feet were on the edge of the platform. As she turned her head, Barton could not see her violin case and deduced that it must have been inside the train.
Barton testified that based on her experience riding on CTA trains, she tried to spring open the train doors. Barton stated that it was difficult to get her right hand into the rubber where the doors met, given her body position. Barton could not see a door handle. Barton got a palm on the right door, but her hand slid down the door. Meanwhile, Barton was saying, "Hey, wait. Hey, open up the doors," thinking someone would hear her. Theresa Croghan, who was jogging on the opposite side of the train at the time, heard a very annoyed voice say, "Wait. Wait. Wait a minute. Wait a minute." Barton stated she had no sense of danger at this time, believing that a conductor would put his head out, see her and open the doors. Ten seconds elapsed before the train began to move.
Barton testified that she could not have removed the strap from her shoulder with a flick of the wrist. Barton stated that she would have had several factors working against her, including: her gloved hand, her awkward angle, the weight of her belongings hanging from her left shoulder; and the puffiness of her coat.
Barton testified that the train suddenly began to move northward while she was facing southward. Barton testified that she immediately stumbled and fell as the train pulled and she was pulled to the ground. Croghan testified that as the train started to move, she heard Barton saying, "No. Stop. No. Stop. No," in a very intense voice. Croghan testified that she knew this was not, as she had thought, someone who had missed a train, but that Barton was attached to the train or that there was a violent crime occurring on the platform.
As the jogging path was roughly three feet lower than the train tracks, Croghan began to look under the wheels of the train. Croghan kept hearing Barton say, "Oh, God." Croghan described it as the most bloodcurdling thing she had ever heard. Croghan testified that she then saw a brown coat in a horizontal position between wheels, which then flashed underneath
Barton testified that she was dragged in a half-sitting position, bumping along gravelly ground next to the wheels. Barton screamed at the top of her lungs. Barton thought she was probably going to die and had to choose between continuing to be dragged, or trying to release herself from her straps. Barton stated that she thought either choice was likely to kill her; if she freed herself by pushing the bags off, she could flip herself under the wheels of the train.
Barton testified that she decided to try to free herself. According to Barton, this was difficult, due to her gloved hand and the force pulling on her and her belongings. Barton testified that the violin strap was the third down, so she got her hand under the straps as a bunch, gave a push to get them over the lump of her coat, and flipped away from the train.
Barton found herself in the gravelly area between the train tracks and the platform. Barton continued screaming because she wanted someone to hear her. Barton testified that she did not know so much pain could exist. Barton stated that all she could see "was like blood and [her] left leg was gone." Checking...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
U.S. ex rel. Keller v. McCann, No. 07 C 3832.
...Page 1016 The Illinois Appellate Court did not cite to McDonough in its opinion, but did cite to Barton v. Chicago & N.W. Trans. Co., 325 Ill.App.3d 1005, 258 Ill.Dec. 844, 757 N.E.2d 533 (2001), which in turn cited McDonough. See Barton, 258 Ill.Dec. 844, 757 N.E.2d at 551-53. To satisfy S......
-
Wilbourn v. Cavalenes, No. 1-08-3603.
...Ill.Dec. 560, 740 N.E.2d 1131. The testimony cannot state new reasons for the opinion. Barton v. Chicago & North Western Trans. Co., 325 Ill.App.3d 1005, 1039, 258 Ill.Dec. 844, 757 N.E.2d 533 (2001). However, a logical corollary to an opinion or a mere elaboration of the original statement......
-
Mikolajczyk v. Ford Motor Co., No. 1-05-3133.
...million for pain and suffering, for a total noneconomic award of $10.2 million); Barton v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co., 325 Ill.App.3d 1005, 258 Ill.Dec. 844, 757 N.E.2d 533 (2001) (upholding an award of $9 million for disability, $8 million for disfigurement, $8 million for ......
-
Crowley v. Watson, No. 1–14–2847.
...of the trial court for an abuse of discretion. Barton v. Chicago & North 401 Ill.Dec. 89351 N.E.3d 86 Western Transportation Co., 325 Ill.App.3d 1005, 1026, 258 Ill.Dec. 844, 757 N.E.2d 533 (2001). An abuse of discretion occurs if the judge's ruling is arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable o......
-
U.S. ex rel. Keller v. McCann, No. 07 C 3832.
...Page 1016 The Illinois Appellate Court did not cite to McDonough in its opinion, but did cite to Barton v. Chicago & N.W. Trans. Co., 325 Ill.App.3d 1005, 258 Ill.Dec. 844, 757 N.E.2d 533 (2001), which in turn cited McDonough. See Barton, 258 Ill.Dec. 844, 757 N.E.2d at 551-53. To satisfy S......
-
Wilbourn v. Cavalenes, No. 1-08-3603.
...Ill.Dec. 560, 740 N.E.2d 1131. The testimony cannot state new reasons for the opinion. Barton v. Chicago & North Western Trans. Co., 325 Ill.App.3d 1005, 1039, 258 Ill.Dec. 844, 757 N.E.2d 533 (2001). However, a logical corollary to an opinion or a mere elaboration of the original statement......
-
Mikolajczyk v. Ford Motor Co., No. 1-05-3133.
...million for pain and suffering, for a total noneconomic award of $10.2 million); Barton v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co., 325 Ill.App.3d 1005, 258 Ill.Dec. 844, 757 N.E.2d 533 (2001) (upholding an award of $9 million for disability, $8 million for disfigurement, $8 million for ......
-
Crowley v. Watson, No. 1–14–2847.
...of the trial court for an abuse of discretion. Barton v. Chicago & North 401 Ill.Dec. 89351 N.E.3d 86 Western Transportation Co., 325 Ill.App.3d 1005, 1026, 258 Ill.Dec. 844, 757 N.E.2d 533 (2001). An abuse of discretion occurs if the judge's ruling is arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable o......