Burch v. City of Lakeland
| Decision Date | 02 February 2005 |
| Docket Number | No. 2D04-2271.,2D04-2271. |
| Citation | 891 So.2d 654 |
| Parties | Glenn K. BURCH, Appellant, v. CITY OF LAKELAND, Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Glenn K. Burch, pro se.
Charles E. Jacobson of Lakeland Police Department, Lakeland, for Appellee.
Glenn Burch appeals a final summary judgment forfeiting his car to the City of Lakeland under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act. We reverse because the court failed to afford due process by allowing Burch to appear or be heard at the summary judgment hearing.
The City filed a verified complaint seeking the forfeiture of Burch's car after drugs were discovered inside it, and ultimately the City filed a motion for summary judgment. Burch, a state prison inmate, filed a pro se motion asking to be transported from prison to attend the scheduled summary judgment hearing. In the alternative, Burch asked for a continuance of the hearing until his release from prison in eleven months. After the hearing, which Burch did not attend, the circuit court entered a summary judgment and final order of forfeiture in favor of the City. In the same order, the court denied Burch's motion to appear at the hearing, stating that his presence was not necessary because the court's disposition of a summary judgment motion was based on a consideration of the record. A court should consider any relevant factors when deciding whether to have a prisoner transported to attend a civil hearing, including "risk of escape, need for expedited disposition, costs, inconvenience, security precautions, the nature of the hearing, [and] impact of court ordered transportation on the state and the correctional agencies involved[.]" Waugh v. Waugh, 679 So.2d 1, 2 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996),disagreed with on other grounds by Mascola v. Lusskin, 727 So.2d 328 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
. As an alternative to the prisoner's physical presence, a court may permit the prisoner's appearance by telephone. Id.; see also Helm v. Foote, 841 So.2d 639 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
The record in this case reveals that when denying Burch's motion the court considered only the nature of the hearing. It failed to consider the alternative of having Burch appear by telephone. Consequently, Burch suffered a summary judgment forfeiting his property without being given an opportunity to be heard. ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Buzzard v. F.F. Enterprises
...unfair and violative of constitutional rights where court denied motion to appear telephonically); Burch v. City of Lakeland, 891 So.2d 654, 656 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2005) (finding error in trial court's failure to consider telephonic participation as alternative to personal appearance); State ......
-
Carson-Grayson v. Grayson
...him.’ " VMD Fin. Servs., Inc. v. CB Loan Purchase Assocs., LLC, 68 So.3d 997, 999 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (quoting Burch v. City Of Lakeland, 891 So.2d 654, 656 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ). Violations of due process rights are fundamental error. Kilnapp v. Kilnapp, 140 So.3d 1051, 1053 (Fla. 4th DCA 2......
-
Vmd Financial Serv. Inc. v. Cb Loan Purchase Associates Llc
...a real opportunity to be heard and defend in an orderly procedure, before judgment is rendered against him.’ ” Burch v. City of Lakeland, 891 So.2d 654, 656 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (quoting Dep't of Law Enforcement v. Real Prop., 588 So.2d 957, 960 (Fla.1991)). VMD and BPS were completely denied......
-
Qiu Feng Ke v. Gallagher
...and (4) arrange transportation or provide an alternative method for Ke to participate in all proceedings. See Burch v. City of Lakeland, 891 So. 2d 654, 656 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (listing relevant factors to consider when deciding whether to transport a prisoner to attend a civil proceeding an......
-
Tipping the ole tipsy coachman over in his grave: an inequity of appellate review.
...Law Enforcement v. Real Property, 588 So. 2d 957, 960 (Fla. 1991) (citing FLA. CONST. art. I, [section] 9,); Burch v. City of Lakeland, 891 So. 2d 654, 656 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 2005) (citing Real (46) Dept. of Law Enforcement v. Real Property, 588 So. 2d at 960; Burch v. City of Lakeland, 891 So......