GOVERNMENT & CIVIC EMPLOYEES ORGANIZ. COM. v. Windsor
Decision Date | 17 February 1956 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 7466. |
Citation | 146 F. Supp. 214 |
Parties | GOVERNMENT AND CIVIC EMPLOYEES ORGANIZING COMMITTEE, CIO, an unincorporated association; E. J. Habshey, Plaintiffs, v. S. F. WINDSOR, Harrell Hammonds, Knox McRae, Clarence V. Evans and Melvin Dawkins, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama |
Arthur J. Goldberg, David E. Feller, and Thomas E. Harris, Washington, D. C., and Cooper, Mitch & Black, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiffs.
Si Garrett, Atty. Gen. of Alabama, and M. Roland Nachman, Jr., William H. Sanders, Jesse M. Williams, Jr., and Gordon Madison, Asst. Attys. Gen. of Alabama, for defendants.
Before RIVES, Circuit Judge, LYNNE, Chief Judge, and GROOMS, District Judges.
On appeal on the 1st day of February, 1954, the Supreme Court of the United States entered its judgment granting a motion to affirm and ordering and adjudging "that the judgment of the District Court in this cause be, and it is hereby, affirmed with costs." See 347 U. S. 901, 74 S.Ct. 429, 98 L.Ed. 1061.
Thereafter on the 19th day of February, 1954, the plaintiff association filed in the Circuit Court of Montogmery County, Alabama in Equity, its bill of complaint praying for an injunction and a declaratory judgment determining the status of said association, under said Alabama statute. The said State Circuit Court on the 12th day of April, 1954 entered its final decree in said cause, by which it declared in pertinent part that:
On appeal, that final decree was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Alabama on the 10th day of March, 1955, pursuant to an opinion reported in 262 Ala. 785, 78 So.2d 646.
The case is again submitted to this Court for final decree upon the pleadings, affidavits, and testimony taken orally upon the earlier hearing.
Admittedly, the case has now remained pending, in accordance with the earlier judgment, "for a reasonable time to permit the exhaustion of such State administrative and judicial remedies as may be available". As indicated, we have heretofore decided that the Solomon Bill can be so construed as to meet the challenge of unconstitutionality, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
NATIONAL ASS'N FOR ADVANCE. OF COLORED PEOPLE v. Patty
...that Court was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Alabama. 262 Ala. 285, 78 So.2d 646. The case was again submitted to the District Court. 146 F. Supp. 214. That Court said on page "After a thorough reading and consideration of the final decree of the Circuit Court of Montgomery County in Equ......
-
Cardinal Sporting Goods Company v. Eagleton
...and Civic Employees Organizing Committee, CIO v. Windsor, 353 U.S. 364, 77 S.Ct. 838, 1 L.Ed.2d 894, a case in which the District Court, 146 F.Supp. 214, was directed to abstain, no state court had been presented with a case in which the constitutional questions had been advanced. There was......
-
Government and Civic Employees Organizing Committee, Cio v. Windsor
...a manner as to render it unconstitutional, and, of course, we cannot assume that the State courts will ever so construe said statute.' 146 F.Supp. 214, 216. We noted probable jurisdiction. 352 U.S. 905, 77 S.Ct. 149, 1 L.Ed.2d We do not reach the constitutional issues. In an action brought ......
-
Alabama Lab. Coun., PEU, Loc. No. 1279 v. State of Alabama
...the Act "in such a manner as to render it unconstitutional." Government and Civic Employees Organizing Committee, CIO v. Windsor, 146 F.Supp. 214 (N.D.Ala. 1956). On appeal the United States Supreme Court vacated the district court's judgment. Government and Civic Employees Organizing Commi......