M & J Materials, Inc. v. Isbell (Ex parte Isbell)
Decision Date | 28 June 2013 |
Docket Number | 1091163. |
Citation | 153 So.3d 8 |
Parties | Ex parte Stanford D. ISBELL. (In re M & J Materials, Inc. v. Stanford D. Isbell). |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
David Madison Tidmore of Weaver Tidmore, LLC, Birmingham, for petitioner.
Erskine R. Funderburg, Jr., of Trussell & Funderburg, P.C., Pell City, for respondent.
We granted a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by Stanford D. Isbell challenging the reversal by the Court of Civil Appeals of a judgment entered on a jury verdict in Isbell's favor against Isbell's former employer, M & J Materials, Inc. (“M & J”), on a claim alleging retaliatory discharge. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and remand the case.
In February 2007, Isbell sued M & J and fictitiously named defendants in the Jefferson Circuit Court seeking an award of benefits under the Alabama Workers' Compensation Act, Ala.Code 1975, § 25–5–1 et seq. (“the Act”), based upon a workplace injury to his wrist that occurred on June 15, 2006. Isbell further sought compensatory damages and punitive damages based on a claim of retaliatory discharge. In its answer to the complaint, M & J denied liability and, as to the retaliatory-discharge claim, specifically averred that Isbell's employment had been terminated “for possession of and wielding a firearm within the workplace and property of” M & J. The parties thereafter settled their differences as to the claim for disability benefits under the Act, leaving pending only the retaliatory-discharge claim. M & J filed a motion for a summary judgment as to the retaliatory-discharge claim, which Isbell opposed; that motion was denied.
A trial was held on the retaliatory-discharge claim beginning on November 17, 2008. The Court of Civil Appeals' opinion provided a rendition of most of the facts adduced at trial, which we quote below. We have interspersed footnotes where appropriate to detail certain facts contained in the record but not mentioned by the Court of Civil Appeals.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
M & J Materials, Inc. v. Isbell, 2080880.
... ... M & J Materials, Inc. v. Isbell, 153 So.3d 1 (Ala.Civ.App.2010). The employee filed a petition for certiorari review, and our supreme court reversed the judgment of this court. See Ex parte Isbell, 153 So.3d 8 (Ala.2013). In its opinion, the supreme court noted the following:Our reversal of the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals on the issue of [the employee]'s prima facie case for retaliatory discharge revives two issues [the employer] argued in its appeal of the jury verdict ... ...
-
Morel v. Chevron Mining, Inc.
... ... a motion for summary judgment must cite "to particular parts of materials in the record, including depositions, documents, electronically stored ... See Ex parte Isbell, 153 So. 3d 8, 23 n.13 (Ala. 2013) (citing Culbreth v. Woodham ... ...