Swift v. Hemp & Co.
| Decision Date | 13 March 1967 |
| Docket Number | Gen. No. 66-68. |
| Citation | 224 N.E.2d 479,80 Ill. App.2d 478 |
| Parties | Judy K. Swift, Administrator of the Estate of Earl Swift, Deceased, Appellant-Plaintiff, and Judy Swift Gordon, Appellant-Intervening Plaintiff, v. Hemp and Company, King-Seeley Thermos Company, Successor in Interest to the American Thermos Products Company, Appellee-Defendant. |
| Court | United States Appellate Court of Illinois |
Scott & Sebo, of Canton, for appellant.
Berry, Leighty & Simshauser, of Macomb, for appellee.
(Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE STOUDER.
Judgment affirmed.
Not to be published in full.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Nerone v. Boehler
...by the trial court before any extrinsic evidence can be introduced. (Schneider v. Neubert, 308 Ill. 40, 139 N.E. 84; Swift v. Hemp & Co., 80 Ill.App.2d 478, 224 N.E.2d 479; Gaffney v. William J. Burns Detective Agency Intern., Inc., 12 Ill.App.3d 476, 299 N.E.2d 540; 12 I.L.P., Contracts, §......
-
Village of North Riverside v. Brookfield-North Riverside Water Commission
...meanings in the affidavits filed by the parties are not determinative of whether such provisions are ambiguous. Swift v. Hemp & Co., 80 Ill.App.2d 478, 224 N.E.2d 479. We conclude as a matter of law that section 1(b) is not There being no genuine issue of material fact, the trial judge prop......
- Hall Tp. High School Dist. No. 502, Bureau County v. County Bd. of School Trustees of Bureau County