Triangle Conduit & Cable Co. v. National Electric Products Corporation
| Decision Date | 09 April 1942 |
| Docket Number | No. 8974.,8974. |
| Citation | 127 F.2d 524 |
| Parties | TRIANGLE CONDUIT & CABLE CO., Inc., et al. v. NATIONAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTS CORPORATION. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
Darby & Darby, of New York City, and Whittemore, Hulbert & Belknap, of Detroit, Mich., for appellants.
Pennie, Davis, Marvin & Edmonds, of New York City, and Harness, Dickey & Pierce, of Detroit, Mich., for appellee.
Before SIMONS, ALLEN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
The appeal in the above cause is from an order denying a motion on behalf of appellants who were defendants below, to restrain the plaintiff from further prosecution of a cause based upon patent infringements; and
It appearing that the motion, while in terms praying for an injunction, is but in substance and effect a motion for a stay of proceedings pending the adjudication of a cause in the District Court of Delaware, wherein the defendant seeks a declaratory judgment; and
It being the view of the court that the order appealed from is not a final appealable order and is not one denying an interlocutory injunction within the scope of Section 129 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S. C.A. § 227, as interpreted in Emery v. Central Trust & Safe Deposit Co., 6 Cir., 204 F. 965; Griesa v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 165 F. 48; Cover v. Schwartz, 2 Cir., 112 F.2d 566; and a motion having been made to dismiss the appeal.
It is further ordered that the dismissal of the appeal, as above directed, is without prejudice to the entertaining of renewed motions for a stay of proceedings based upon changes of the law in respect to the Delaware litigation.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United Gas Pipe Line Company v. Tyler Gas Service Company
...v. Preston, 2 Cir., 172 F.2d 308; International Nickel Co. v. Martin J. Barry, 4 Cir., 204 F.2d 583; Triangle Conduit & Cable Co. v. National Electric Products Corp., 6 Cir., 127 F.2d 524; Sinclair Refining Co. v. Tompkins, 5 Cir., 133 F.2d 198; Wilson Bros. v. Textile Workers Union of Amer......
-
International Nickel Co. v. Martin J. Barry, Inc.
...States, 4 Cir., 188 F.2d 289; Jiffy Lubricator Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp., 4 Cir., 177 F.2d 360; Triangle Conduit & Cable Co., Inc., v. National Electric Products Corp., 6 Cir., 127 F.2d 524; Beckhardt v. National Power & Light Co., 2 Cir., 164 F.2d 199; Phillips v. Securities & Exchange C......
-
Dowling Bros. Distilling Co. v. United States
...an injunction, and this distinction was stressed in Cover v. Schwartz, 2 Cir., 112 F.2d 566. Compare Triangle Conduit & Cable Co. v. National Electric Products Corp., 6 Cir., 127 F.2d 524. With this view we are in accord. It follows that the appeal in No. 10,009 must be dismissed. The dismi......
-
Day v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company
...Iron Works, 3 Cir., 1956, 230 F. 2d 108, 109. 5 Cover v. Schwartz, 2 Cir., 1940, 112 F.2d 566; Triangle Conduit & Cable Co. v. National Electric Products Corporation, 6 Cir., 1942, 127 F.2d 524; United States v. Horns, 3 Cir., 1945, 147 F.2d 57; Beckhardt v. National Power & Light Co., 2 Ci......