FT Travel—N.Y., LLC v. Your Travel Ctr., Inc.
Decision Date | 26 June 2015 |
Docket Number | Case No. CV 15–01065 MMM (MANx). |
Citation | 112 F.Supp.3d 1063 |
Parties | FT TRAVEL—NEW YORK, LLC, d/b/a Frosch Travel, Plaintiff, v. YOUR TRAVEL CENTER, INC.; YTC Travel, LLC ; and Colin Weatherhead, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Central District of California |
Shaunt T. Arevian, Vincent J. Davitt, Meylan Davitt Jain Arevian and Kim LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Michael V. Rella, Soren E. Packer, Murphy and McGonigle PC, New York, NY, for Plaintiff.
Archana Ramma Acharya, Foley and Lardner LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Peter N. Wang, Yonaton Aronoff, Foley and Lardner LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
On February 13, 2015, FT Travel New York, LLC, d/b/a Frosch Travel ("Frosch"), filed this breach of contract action against Your Travel Center, Inc.("YTC"), YTC Travel, LLC("LLC"), and Colin Weatherhead(collectively, "defendants").1On April 10, 2015, defendants filed a motion to dismiss Frosch's complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.2Frosch opposes defendants' motion.3
Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7–15, the court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument.The hearing calendared for June 29, 2015, is therefore vacated, and the matter is taken off calendar.
Frosch is a travel management company that has headquarters in Houston, Texas and New York, New York.4It was founded more than forty years ago and specializes in providing high-touch leisure and corporate travel services to individuals and companies by, among other things, selling air transportation.5It purportedly employs more than 1,400 employees nationwide.Its current president and Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") is Bryan Leibman.6During Leibman's tenure, Frosch has purportedly been ranked as one of the top ten travel management companies in the United States.7
YTC is an independent retail travel agency that is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.8Colin Weatherhead is YTC's current president and CEO.9YTC allegedly provides services similar to those offered by Frosch; specifically, YTC sells air transportation and various other travel services to its clients.10Unlike Frosch, however, YTC allegedly operates on a smaller scale—it maintains approximately seven offices and primarily serves clients in Southern California and Arizona.11LLC is a non-existent entity that Frosch asserts was mistakenly named in a business contract between Frosch and defendants.12
Leibman purportedly first met Weatherhead in 2009; during the ensuing five years, the men developed a personal relationship.13Frosch alleges that, on multiple occasions, Weatherhead professed admiration for Frosch's business model and Leibman's leadership, and conveyed an interest in entering into a business relationship with Frosch.14To that end, Leibman and Weatherhead purportedly discussed a contractual arrangement pursuant to which YTC would report all of its airline sales through a Frosch Airlines Reporting Corporation("ARC") branch office.15The parties further purportedly contemplated that when Weatherhead decided to retire from the travel management business, he would sell YTC to Frosch for a price based on a formula set forth in a written sale agreement.16As consideration for its agreement to report airline sales through a Frosch ARC office and be purchased by Frosch, YTC was purportedly to receive, inter alia, access to Frosch's network of service providers and preferred relationships, and to benefit from Frosch's operating and technological expertise.17
The parties also purportedly contemplated that YTC would receive significant cash payments and credits in the form of "commissions" and "overrides" from airline companies as a result of reporting airline sales through Frosch's ARC office.18The amount of these commissions and overrides is allegedly tied to the volume of sales reported by a travel agency through a particular ARC branch office.19As a result, smaller travel agencies allegedly receive small commission or override payments because their air travel sales are generally on a small scale while large travel agencies purportedly receive large commissions and overrides due to the substantial volume of sales they report through ARCs.20Frosch alleges that, under the agreement contemplated, YTC was likely going to receive larger overrides and commissions by reporting its sales through Frosch's ARC branch office than it otherwise would.21
At some point between 2009 and 2014, while Leibman and Weatherhead were purportedly negotiating a business agreement between Frosch and YTC, Leibman allegedly traveled to YTC's office in Arizona to meet with Weatherhead and YTC's other shareholders.22Weatherhead also purportedly traveled to Frosch's Houston headquarters to meet with Leibman during the course of negotiations.23Frosch alleges that during the parties' numerous discussions between 2009 and 2014, Weatherhead stated it was his intent to transfer YTC's business to Frosch and to have Frosch acquire YTC ultimately.At no time was severing the planned business relationship discussed.24
Unbeknownst to Frosch, YTC allegedly entered into an agreement with another travel management company, Tzell Travel LLC("Tzell"), on August 26, 2009(the "Tzell Agreement").25Under the terms of the Tzell Agreement, Tzell was purportedly obligated to establish a joint ARC branch office with YTC (the "Tzell/YTC Branch") through which YTC was to report its airline and other travel services sales.26
In November 2014, Leibman and Weatherhead allegedly resumed their discussion of a business arrangement pursuant to which YTC would report all of its airline sales through Frosch's ARC branch office and Frosch would ultimately acquire YTC.27On November 23, 2014, Frosch and YTC purportedly entered into an agreement (the "Frosch Agreement" or "Agreement") reflecting Leibman's and Weatherhead's discussions.28
Frosch asserts that the Frosch Agreement was collectively negotiated and drafted by Leibman and Weatherhead.29It names two parties: FT Travel–New York, LLC, d/b/a Frosch Travel ("Frosch"), and YTC Travel, LLC("LLC").30Frosch alleges that LLC is a non-existent entity that was erroneously identified by Robin Sanchez, YTC's COO, on October 21, 2014, when she filled in the name of Frosch's counter-party on the Frosch Agreement.31The parties purportedly intended to name YTC as a party to the contract.32
The Frosch Agreement allegedly requires YTC to report airline sales through Frosch's ARC branch office.33It states that "YTC shall transfer all of its business to an ARC ... branch office of FROSCH at the YTC location; and in this regard, shall process all its client requests for air transportation using ARC facilities contracted to FROSCH."34So that YTC could report airline sales through a Frosch branch office, Frosch agreed to establish an ARC branch office at YTC's main office and transfer the address of its ARC office to that location.35After this was done, YTC was required to "begin reporting all of its airline sales through the FROSCH ARC."36The Agreement sets forth a payment structure under which YTC would receive a portion of the commissions and overrides generated by sales it reported through the ARC branch.Frosch was to receive the balance of the commissions and overrides.37
Frosch alleges that the Agreement required YTC to report airline sales through Frosch's ARC branch office until Weatherhead decided to sell YTC to Frosch.38It also asserts the Agreement sets forth the process by which YTC would be sold to Frosch.39The Agreement's "Succession" provision states, in relevant part:
Frosch alleges that these provisions reflect the parties' intent that Frosch would ultimately acquire YTC's business.41It contends that, in connection with the Agreement's "Succession" provision, Leibman met and spoke with YTC's shareholders, each of whom purportedly agreed and confirmed that YTC would ultimately be sold to Frosch.42
The Succession provision also states:
"[i]n the event that Bryan Leibman is no longer able to serve as CEO and President of FROSCH or if FROSCH changes ownership, the following will occur: 1) YTC will have an option to continue with this agreement or to terminate at any time thereafter merely by providing 30 days written notice."43
Frosch contends that this provision addresses termination of the Frosch...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Zaldivar v. City of San Diego, CASE NO. 15CV67-GPC(RBB)
...raised for the first time on reply is improper and should not be considered by the Court. See FT Travel-New York, LLC v. Your Travel Ctr, Inc., 112 F. Supp. 3d 1063, 1079 (C.D. Cal. 2015); Kowalski v. Mommy Gina Tun Res., 574 F. Supp. 2d 1160, 1164 (D. Haw. 2008) (disregarding arguments mad......
-
Airbnb, Inc. v. City & Cnty. of S.F.
...consider it for that reason alone. United States v. Romm , 455 F.3d 990, 997 (9th Cir. 2006) ; FT Travel–New York, LLC v. Your Travel Center, Inc. , 112 F.Supp.3d 1063, 1079 (C.D. Cal. 2015). The Court addresses it anyway for the sake of completeness and because the risk that plaintiffs hav......
-
Antonov v. Gen. Motors
... ... § 1331.” Peralta v ... Hisp. Bus., Inc. , 419 F.3d 1064, 1069 (9th Cir. 2005) ... Diversity ... Ctr. for Bio ... Diversity v. United States Forest Serv ... 2007) (citation ... omitted); see also FT Travel-New York, LLC v. Your Travel ... Ctr., Inc ., 112 ... ...
-
Las Vegas Sun, Inc. v. Adelson
...obligation to plead sufficient factual allegations in support of that [alternative] request." FT Travel-New York, LLC v. YourTravel Ctr., Inc., 112 F. Supp. 3d 1063, 1073 (C.D. Cal. 2015) (quoting Milo & Gabby, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., 12 F. Supp. 3d 1341, 1353-54 (W.D. Wash. 2014)); see al......