IN RE PEORIA & EASTERN RY. CO
Decision Date | 03 April 1941 |
Citation | 37 F. Supp. 917 |
Parties | In re PEORIA & EASTERN RY. CO. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
Jacob Aronson and Crosby J. Beakes, both of New York City, for petitioner.
Charles S. Aronstam and Archie S. Karp, both of New York City, for income bondholders.
Louis G. Bernstein, Julius J. Rosenberg, Leonard B. Frutkin, and William J. Reinhart, Jr., all of New York City, for first mortgage bondholders.
Heard pursuant to Title 11 United States Code, Section 1213, 11 U.S.C.A. § 1213, by a three-judge court consisting of LEARNED HAND, Circuit Judge, WOOLSEY, and HULBERT, District Judges.
Our judgment on the matters now presented1 is —
1. That Section 2 of the proposed agreement in respect of the Railroad Adjustment here involved to be made between the Peoria & Eastern Railway Company, the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company — commonly known as the "Big Four" — the New York Central Railroad Company and the Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, be and it hereby is amended so as to read as hereinafter prescribed.
2. That Section 24 of the final decree entered herein on the 29th day of July, 1940, be and it hereby is amended so as to read as hereinafter prescribed.
3. That the petitioner Railway Company be allowed — in addition to the expenses granted by Section 21 of the decree, filed July 29, 1940 — its expenses in the sum of $6,184.61, covering the following items:
Expenses on account of imprinting legends on Bonds...................... $ 500.00 Expenses for advertising various notices .............................. 1,760.45 Expenses for printing, postage insurance, registration, etc.......... 2,683.76 Fee for listing extended Bonds on New York Stock Exchange............... 600.00 Expense of transcript of stenographer's minutes .............................. 390.40 Recording fee (Supplemental Indenture satisfaction pieces) estimated ............................ 250.00 _________ Total ........................... $6,184.61
And also be allowed counsel fees, hereby fixed in the sum of $2,000, to Larkin, Rathbone & Perry for services herein to the Indenture Trustee, the Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company.
4. That the petitions of the intervenors and their counsel for allowances be and they hereby are dismissed without costs, on the ground that the Court is without jurisdiction to grant any allowances to others than the petitioner Railway.
I. We see no reason why the Peoria & Eastern Railway Company should be required to send out to income bondholders the names of any persons who may wish to be elected directors to represent the income bondholders. We think the income bondholders should do their own electioneering.
We hold, therefore, that the second paragraph of the proposed agreement in respect of the Railroad Adjustment under discussion between the Peoria & Eastern Railway Company, the "Big Four", the New York Central Railroad Company and the Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, should be amended so as to read as follows:
II. We hold that Article 24 of the final decree entered herein on the 29th day of July, 1940, be and it hereby is amended — the inserted amendment being italicized — so as to read as follows:
III. A. By way of preface to the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ewen v. Peoria & E. Ry. Co.
...report of the Master under the rules.2 On July 29, 1940, we passed a decree, Section 24 of which, as amended by our opinion on April 3, 1941, 37 F.Supp. 917, we quote in the margin.3 Early in 1943 the "Central" filed the annual account between the roads required by Article Fourth of the Ope......
-
In re Baltimore & OR Co.
...753; Ewen v. Peoria & Eastern R. Co., D.C., 34 F.Supp. 332, certiorari denied 311 U.S. 700, 61 S.Ct. 138, 85 L.Ed. 454; In re Peoria & E. R. Co., D.C., 37 F.Supp. 917, certiorari denied Ewen v. Peoria & E. R. Co., 314 U. S. 635, 62 S.Ct. 69, 86 L.Ed. 510; Id., D.C., 49 F.Supp. 83; In re Wic......
- Coos Bay Lumber Co. v. Pillsbury
-
IN RE PEORIA & E. RY. CO.
...is a rehearing, on leave granted, of the judgment reached by us, and entered pursuant to our opinion reported as In re Peoria & Eastern Railway Co., D.C., 37 F.Supp. 917, wherein we held inter alia that we were not authorized by the statute, Chapter XV of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 1......