F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co. v. United States

Decision Date14 April 1955
Docket NumberCiv. A. No. 14715.
Citation130 F. Supp. 322
PartiesThe F. & M. SCHAEFER BREWING CO., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York

White & Case, New York City, for plaintiff, by E. W. Pavenstedt, New York City, for the motion.

Leonard P. Moore, U. S. Atty., Brooklyn, N. Y., for defendant, by Elliot Kahaner, Brooklyn, N. Y., in opposition.

RAYFIEL, District Judge.

The plaintiff herein moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

The parties agree as to the facts, which are as follows: the plaintiff, a New York corporation, had an authorized capital of 200,000 shares of $12 noncumulative second preferred stock, without par value, having a stated value of $36.25 per share, and 6,500 shares of common stock, the par value of which was $100 per share. Prior to March 21, 1951, there were, issued and outstanding, 100,000 shares of the $12 noncumulative second preferred stock and 1,000 shares of the common stock. 100,000 shares of the said preferred stock and 1,000 shares of the common stock were held as Treasury stock, and 4,500 shares of the common stock were still unissued. The plaintiff's capital was $3,725,000.

On March 21, 1951, pursuant to appropriate action of its Board of Directors, the plaintiff increased the amount of its capital from $3,725,000 to $10,100,000. This was done by transferring the sum of $6,375,000 from its earned surplus account to its capital account. This bookkeeping entry increased the capital represented by each of the issued and outstanding 100,000 shares of no par value second preferred stock from $36.25 to $100 per share. No additional shares were issued. At the same time the 100,000 shares of the preferred stock and the 1,000 shares of common stock held by the corporation as Treasury stock were retired and cancelled.

The plaintiff did not affix any Federal documentary stamps to its stock books or other records. Subsequently, and after an examination of the corporation's books and records by agents of the Internal Revenue Service, a tax of $7,012.50, together with interest in the amount of $177.07, was assessed against the corporation, pursuant to section 1802(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. The corporation paid the assessment, together with interest, and now sues to recover it on the ground that it was erroneously and illegally assessed and collected.

The facts in the case at bar are almost identical with those in the case of United States v. National Sugar Refining Co., D.C., 113 F.Supp. 157, 160, decided by Judge Leibell on April 30, 1953. He held that, "Section 1802(a) is a tax on an original issue of capital stock. It is not a tax on an addition to capital,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co. v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 12 Septiembre 1956
  • United States v. Schaefer Brewing Co
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 7 Abril 1958
    ...issue was joined, respondent moved for summary judgment. The district judge, after hearing the motion, filed an opinion on April 14, 1955 (130 F.Supp. 322, 324), in which, after finding that respondent had paid stamp taxes to the Government in the amout of $7,012.50 and interest in the amou......
  • Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. McMahon
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 30 Marzo 1957
    ...to foreign corporations. 9 United States v. National Sugar Refining Co., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 113 F.Supp. 157; F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co. v. United States, D.C.E.D.N.Y., 130 F.Supp. 322. There have been periods when there was a concurrent tax on capital. Revenue Act of 1918, 40 Stat. 1057, 1126,......
  • Kentile, Inc. v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 11 Octubre 1957
    ...94 F.2d 859. To the same effect is United States v. National Sugar Refining Co., D.C., 113 F.Supp. 157 and F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co. v. United States, D.C., 130 F. Supp. 322. The cases of Southern Pacific Co. v. Berliner, 9 Cir., 176 F.2d 671. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. United States, 94 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT