Union Electric Light & P. Co. v. Cherokee Nat. Bank, 10985.
Decision Date | 28 January 1938 |
Docket Number | No. 10985.,10985. |
Citation | 94 F.2d 517 |
Parties | UNION ELECTRIC LIGHT & POWER CO. v. CHEROKEE NAT. BANK OF ST. LOUIS et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
James E. Carroll, of St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.
Ruby M. Hulen, of St. Louis, Mo., for appellees.
Before GARDNER, SANBORN, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a bill of complaint by which appellant sought a preference in payment from the assets of the appellee, an insolvent national banking association. The bank and its receiver were defendants below and are the appellees here. We shall refer to the parties as they were designated in the lower court.
The bank did business at St. Louis, Missouri. Prior to January 18, 1933, plaintiff had carried a general deposit or checking account with the defendant. About that time it ceased depositing any funds in the bank, but had left in its account about $1,300. This was at a time when many of the smaller banks were suspending business or closing their doors. On January 18, 1933, the president of the bank wrote plaintiff, stating that he had observed that plaintiff had discontinued making deposits and expressed the hope that the bank might look forward to a redepositing in the account. About January 20th, the treasurer of plaintiff went to the bank, taking with him a draft of an agreement which he proposed to submit to the bank. The president of the bank explained that due to the general bank crisis then existing, many of the bank's customers in the vicinity where plaintiff maintained a branch store and branch office would take notice of the fact that plaintiff had discontinued transacting business with it and this would have "an effect on the people, and the bank wanted to guard against any pressure and runs on the bank." Plaintiff's treasurer, following some discussion as to the terms upon which plaintiff might resume its relations with the bank, showed the bank president a copy of the written agreement which he had brought with him, and there was some conversation relating to payment or transfer of the deposit to plaintiff. Concerning this plaintiff's treasurer testified:
A slight modification was made in the proposed agreement and as finally executed by the bank, with the approval of its board of directors, it provided that the plaintiff appointed the bank as its agent, "to collect and/or receive for the Company's account all sums of money due or payable to the Company from its agents, employees or debtors. * * * All funds so received by the Bank shall be promptly accounted for and remitted to the Company, in cash or exchange. The agent Bank's usual collection charges for its services in making such collections shall be paid promptly by the company upon statements rendered by the Bank.
The balance which the bank had on deposit at the time of the execution of this agreement was withdrawn by check, and thereafter the general plan was followed of delivering to the bank cash of plaintiff, the deposit being evidenced by a special form of receipt in substantially the following form:
Then follows statement of the deposit, showing the nature of same, whether currency, silver, gold, or coupons.
Following the execution of the agreement, plaintiff's treasurer wrote to the manager of the branch store of plaintiff, who had charge of the funds for that establishment, advising him of the terms of the contract under which the company would make deposits with the bank. In this regard the instruction states:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Kountze Bros.
...Keyes v. Paducah & I. R. Co., 6 Cir., 61 F.2d 611, 86 A.L.R. 203; Kershaw v. Kimble, 10 Cir., 65 F.2d 553; Union Electric Light & Power Co. v. Cherokee Nat. Bank, 8 Cir., 94 F.2d 517. In the absence of an agreement or proof to the contrary, a deposit in a bank is presumed to be general rath......
-
Merrill Lynch Mortg. Capital, Inc. v. F.D.I.C.
...depositors are entitled to be paid in full before other creditors of the bank. See, e.g., Union Elec. Light & Power Co. v. Cherokee Nat'l Bank of St. Louis, 94 F.2d 517, 519-20 (8th Cir.1938); Bank of Am. Nat'l Trust & Sav. Ass'n v. Commercial Bank, 218 Cal. 261, 22 P.2d 704, 709-10 (1933).......
-
Savings Bank of Rockland County v. FDIC
...trust fund, this Circuit has determined that it is not. See Stratford, supra, 367 F.2d 569, see also Union Electric Light & Power Co. v. Cherokee Nat'l Bank, 94 F.2d 517, 520 (8th Cir.1938); Seattle First Nat'l Bank v. FDIC, 619 F.Supp. 1351 (W.D.Okla.1985). In addition, the circumstances i......
-
In re Northwest Liquor Industries, Inc.
...a cashier's check (which remains uncashed) does not constitute a special deposit but a general deposit. Union Electric Light & P. Co. v. Cherokee Nat. Bank, 94 F.2d 517 (8th Cir.1938); Sites, Robert E. Banks and Banking-Trusts-Special Deposits-Agreement Between Depositor and Bank, 37 Mich.L......