Alexander Eccles & Co. v. Strachan Shipping Co.
Decision Date | 20 July 1927 |
Citation | 21 F.2d 656 |
Parties | ALEXANDER ECCLES & CO. v. STRACHAN SHIPPING CO. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Georgia |
Hartridge, Wright & Brennan, of Savannah, Ga., for libelant.
Adams & Adams, of Savannah, Ga., for libelee.
Liability of respondent for the value of the 28 bales of cotton was decreed by this court November 20, 1924, based upon an opinion (21 F.2d 653) of January 9, 1924.
The questions now to be answered are: (1) What was the value of the cotton? (2) Should interest be allowed, and, if so, at what rate?
There is no issue as to the time and place of the determination of value, i. e., at Manchester, England, on October 10, 1919, the place and time where and when delivery should have been made, and there is no issue as to the price per pound. Sharp issue is taken as to the establishment of the weight by legal evidence.
The 28 bales were portions of four units bearing distinguishing marks. There was no distinguishing mark or weight for each separate bale. The bill of lading acknowledged the aggregate weight of each unit, and this showed an average weight per bale of 513.57 pounds. If it were known that cotton neither lost nor gained weight in transit, this would surely be sufficient, but the evidence is that sometimes the cotton gains weight and sometimes loses weight. I am of the opinion that, in the absence of more definite evidence in contradiction, libelant could rest with this proof, especially as the result so nearly approximates the weight of the "standard" bale, 500 pounds.
Libelant has, however, undertaken to prove the weight of the cotton at Manchester, and, by deducting this from the bill of lading weight, ascertain the weight of the 28 bales. The result is an average weight per bale of 499.89 pounds, indicating that the cotton actually shipped gained in weight in transit. The handling of the cotton upon discharge at Manchester, as proven by an officer of the Manchester Ship Canal Company, was by such company, which has no interest in the cotton or in this suit, and the method was as follows:
The records in the stock ledger were made by
...
To continue reading
Request your trial