London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Leefson

Decision Date16 January 1930
Docket NumberNo. 4226.,4226.
Citation37 F.2d 488
PartiesLONDON GUARANTEE & ACCIDENT CO., Limited, v. LEEFSON.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

Layton M. Schoch, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Pepper, Bodine, Stokes & Schoch, of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for appellant.

L. Stauffer Oliver, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Paxson Deeter, of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for appellee.

Before WOOLLEY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on opinion of Kirkpatrick, District Judge, sur motion for a new trial.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Berry v. Lamar Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • February 13, 1933
    ... ... Cas. 294 ... Where ... the circumstances of an accident are such that it is ... impossible to comply with the provisions in an ... 221; Ward v. Standard Accident Ins. Co., 30 ... F. 328; London Guaranty, etc., Co. v. Leefson, 37 ... F.2d 488; Haskell v. Eagle ... ...
  • Berry v. Lamar Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • June 6, 1932
    ... ... Cas. 294. } ... Where ... the circumstances of an accident are such that it is ... impossible to comply with the provisions in an ... 221; Ward v ... Standard Accident Ins. Co., 30 F. 328; London Guaranty, etc., ... Co. v. Leefson, 37 F.2d 488; Haskell v. Eagle ... ...
  • Mandles v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • November 19, 1940
    ...Life Ins. Co. v. Bethel, 140 Ky. 609, 131 S.W. 523; Standard Accident Ins. Co. v. Rossi, 8 Cir., 35 F.2d 667; London Guaranty & Accident Co. v. Leefson, 3 Cir., 37 F.2d 488; Employers Liability Assur. Corp. v. Dean, 5 Cir., 44 F.2d 524, certiorari denied in 283 U.S. 825, 51 S.Ct. 347, 75 L.......
  • Wheeler v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.S., 32937.
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • January 22, 1942
    ...furnished notice within a reasonable time, and therefore it was properly left to the jury. London G. & A. Co. v. Leefson, 3 Cir., 37 F.2d 488. The judgment must be affirmed.STONE, Justice (dissenting). To me it seems that as matter of law this should be held a case of mere forgetfulness on ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT