U.S. v. Colbert, 89-6094

Decision Date29 January 1990
Docket NumberNo. 89-6094,89-6094
Citation894 F.2d 373
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Johnnie Lamart COLBERT, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit

William P. Earley, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendant-appellant.

Robert E. Mydans, U.S. Atty. for W.D. Okl. (James F. Robinson, Asst. U.S. Atty., with him on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before McKAY and SETH, Circuit Judges, and CONWAY, District Judge. 1

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine base. The statutory penalty for that offense is a term of imprisonment which may not be less than ten years nor more than life. 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846, 841(b)(1)(A)(iii). He was sentenced pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, Pub.L.No. 98-473 Secs. 211-39, 98 Stat. 1837, 1987-2040 (1985) ("the guidelines"). The application of the guidelines produced a range of punishment from 235 to 293 months. The court sentenced him to 264 months, in the middle of the guidelines. The only issue defendant raises on appeal is whether the sentencing guidelines, as applied in this case, constitute cruel and unusual punishment in derogation of the eighth amendment.

The base sentence required by the guidelines for the amount of drugs involved is equivalent to the statutory minimum of ten years which Congress thinks appropriate for that amount of drugs. The balance of the defendant's sentence results from the application of additional factors related to the nature of the crime and defendant's criminal history. The court took into account that the "crack" defendant sold out of an apartment, along with two accomplices, involved as many as two to three hundred customers a day and that he carried a loaded gun. The court also considered the fact that the defendant was on probation from a state court conviction for participating in an armed robbery, and he had two prior felony convictions for property crimes.

The thrust of defendant's eighth amendment argument is based on the principle of disproportionality established in Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277, 103 S.Ct. 3001, 77 L.Ed.2d 637 (1983). The bulk of defendant's argument consists of a comparison of his sentence with sentences for other crimes under the guidelines, including murder, sexual abuse of a minor, kidnapping, and bank robbery. We do not find such comparisons persuasive. The base offense level for this crime is clearly not disproportionate to what Congress and other jurisdictions have indicated is appropriate for drug offenses. Starting from that basis, we cannot say that either the base offense level or the balance of the sentence which is based on the characteristics of the crime and the criminal history of the defendant (particularly the fact that this conduct occurred while he was on probation, demonstrating his lack of response to prior restraint) could remotely meet the standard required to invalidate sentencing under Solem.

We find the Supreme Court's decision in Hutto v. Davis, 454 U.S. 370,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • US v. Mosley
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • 11 December 1992
    ...States v. Buckner, id.; United States v. Malone, id.; United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 839 (9th Cir.1988); United States v. Colbert, 894 F.2d 373 (10th Cir. 1990), cert. den., 496 U.S. 911, 110 S.Ct. 2601, 110 L.Ed.2d 281 (1990); United States v. Cyrus, B. THE INCREASED SENTENCES ......
  • U.S. v. McNeese
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • 2 May 1990
    ...F.2d 386, 389 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Bridges, 760 F.2d 151, 154 (7th Cir.1985). Other circuits concur: United States v. Colbert, 894 F.2d 373, 375 (10th Cir.1990); United States v. Hoyt, 879 F.2d 505, 512-14, amended by 888 F.2d 1257 (9th Cir.1989); United States v. Mendoza, 876 F......
  • Maritime Elec. Co., Inc. v. United Jersey Bank
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 2 December 1991
    ... ... Since our analysis of the automatic stay issue leads us to conclude that the last order entered by the district court in this case did not finally decide ... ...
  • U.S. v. Pickett
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 1 August 1991
    ...eighth amendment challenge to the 100:1 ratio have rejected it. United States v. Buckner, 894 F.2d 975 (8th Cir.1990); United States v. Colbert, 894 F.2d 373 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 2601, 110 L.Ed.2d 281 (1990); United States v. Cyrus, 890 F.2d 1245 (D.C.Cir.1989......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT