Roberts v. Nat'l Transp. Safety Bd., 14-1022

Decision Date10 July 2018
Docket NumberNo. 14-1022,14-1022
Citation894 F.3d 406 (Mem)
Parties James L. ROBERTS, Petitioner v. NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD and Federal Aviation Administration, Respondents
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit

894 F.3d 406 (Mem)

James L. ROBERTS, Petitioner
v.
NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD and Federal Aviation Administration, Respondents

No. 14-1022

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided July 10, 2018


David B. Anderson and Deanna L. Weidner were on the motions to supplement Equal Access to Justice Act application and the reply for petitioner.

Sonia M. Carson and Charles W. Scarborough, Attorneys, U.S. Department of Justice, were on the opposition for the respondents.

Before: Wilkins, Circuit Judge, and Sentelle and Randolph, Senior Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:

Before us is the application of James L. Roberts for attorney’s fees and expenses he incurred in 2014 and 2015 in connection with his successful petition for judicial review in Roberts v. National Transportation Safety Board , 776 F.3d 918 (D.C. Cir. 2015).1 Roberts filed his application with this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Section 2412 requires a party seeking fees and expenses to file an application "within thirty days of final judgment in the action." Id. § 2412(d)(1)(B). Our decision in Roberts v. National Transportation Safety Board became final on April 23, 2015. The limitations period in § 2412 runs from the time of final judgment in "the court before which the civil action is pending ," not from the final decision of an administrative agency. Melkonyan v. Sullivan , 501 U.S. 89, 94, 111 S.Ct. 2157, 115 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991) (emphasis in original); see also id. at 94–95, 111 S.Ct. 2157. Because Roberts submitted his § 2412 application on May 4, 2018, more than three years after this court’s final judgment, his application was untimely. We therefore deny it.

So ordered.

--------

Notes:

1 The subject of Roberts’ petition for judicial review was the National Transportation Safety Board’s denial of his request, which he filed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 504, for legal fees and expenses incurred in administrative proceedings. This court ruled in Roberts’ favor and remanded the case to the Board. On April 4, 2018, the Board granted Roberts’ application for fees and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Simon v. Republic of Hung.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • December 30, 2021
    ... ... Ct. at 714 (Roberts, C.J., writing for a unanimous Court) ("As a ... ...
  • Rodriguez v. Pan Am. Health Org.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • November 9, 2020
    ... ... Save Our Sch. v. D.C. Bd. of Educ. , No. 04-1500, 2005 WL 8178067, at *2 ... ...
  • Beierwaltes v. L'Office Federale De La Culture De La Confederation Suisse
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • June 8, 2021
  • Philipp v. Fed. Republic of Ger.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • June 18, 2019
    ... ... See , e.g. , Natl Assn of Home Builders v. Defs. of Wildlife , 551 ... Cf. England v. La. State Bd. of Med. Examrs , 375 U.S. 411, 41319, 84 S.Ct ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT