Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Whitescarver, 6790.
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
Writing for the Court | BRYAN, SIBLEY, and HUTCHESON, Circuit |
Citation | 68 F.2d 928 |
Parties | MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT CO. v. WHITESCARVER et al. |
Docket Number | No. 6790.,6790. |
Decision Date | 02 March 1934 |
68 F.2d 928 (1934)
MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT CO.
v.
WHITESCARVER et al.
No. 6790.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
February 2, 1934.
Rehearing Denied March 2, 1934.
Marcellus Green, Garner Wynn Green, and Forrest B. Jackson, all of Jackson, Miss., and R. L. Dent, of Vicksburg, Miss., for appellant.
J. F. Barbour, of Yazoo City, Miss., for appellees.
Before BRYAN, SIBLEY, and HUTCHESON, Circuit Judges.
SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
On this appeal from a recovery of $7,500 for the negligent electrocution of one Whitescarver, the Mississippi Power & Light Company assigns as error the exclusion as evidence of an extract from a book and the refusal to direct the verdict in its favor. The declaration alleged as negligence among other things that the company maintained its power wires, carrying 13,000 volts, at an insufficient height where the death occurred, and that its representatives who were present just beforehand and knew what Whitescarver was about to do and the danger in it did not stop or warn him, and he, being ignorant of the danger, brought a metal pole which he was erecting against or near a wire and was killed by electricity from it. The outline of the evidence is as follows: Three power lines, bare and carrying 13,000 volts of electricity, were strung by virtue of a public franchise on common looking poles along the
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hillman v. Northern Wasco County People's Utility Dist.
...... Two power poles were placed about 10 feet apart at the south edge of ... Hillman found his own truck too light for the job and hired a tow truck equipped with a winch to ...261, 295 P.2d 201; Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Whitescarver, 5 Cir., 68 F.2d 928; ......
-
Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Shepard, 46986
...Light Co. v. Griffin, 81 F.2d 292 (5 Cir. 1936); Whitescarver v. Mississippi Power & Light Co., 5 F.Supp. 948 (D.C.Miss.1932) aff. 68 F.2d 928 (5th Cir. 1934); Holocomb v. Singing River Electric Power Association, 231 So.2d 192 (Miss.1970); Mississippi Power & Light Company v. Walters, 248 ......
-
Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Walters
...(1922), 98 N.J.L. 160, 119 A. 163; Neumann v. Interstate Power Co. (1929), 179 Minn. 46, 228 N.W. 342; Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Whitescarver (1934), (C.A. 5th Miss.), 68 F.2d 928; Sandeen v. Willow River Power Co. (1934), 214 Wis. 166, 252 N.W. 706; Southwestern Gas & Electric Co. v......
-
Catholic Diocese of Natchez-Jackson v. Jaquith
...So. 677 (1929). Mississippi has followed the majority rule for a number of years and we think properly so. See Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Whitescarver, 68 F.2d 928 (1934). See also Crouch v. Mississippi Power & Light Co., 193 So.2d 144 (Miss.1966) and Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. ......