Cent. States, Se. & Sw. Areas Health & Welfare Fund v. Haynes, 17 C 6275
Decision Date | 19 July 2019 |
Docket Number | No. 17 C 6275,17 C 6275 |
Citation | 397 F.Supp.3d 1149 |
Parties | CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, and Charles A. Whobrey, Trustee, Plaintiffs, v. Shelby L. HAYNES, an Individual, N. Gerald DiCuccio, Esq., an Individual, and Butler, Cincione & DiCuccio, an Ohio Partnership, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois |
Rebecca Kate McMahon, Central States Funds, Illinois, IL, Timothy Craig Reuter, Central States Funds, Lois J. Yu, Robert Anthony Coco, Central States Law Department, Matthew Wesley, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs.
John A. Yaklevich, Pro Hac Vice, Moore & Yaklevich, Nicholas Gerald DiCuccio, Pro Hac Vice, Butler Cincione & Dicuccio, Columbus, OH, Xiaoyin Cao, Carmen D. Caruso Law Firm, Chicago, IL, for Defendants.
Carmen David Caruso, Mario Michael Bosone, Carmen D. Caruso Law Firm, Chicago, IL, for Defendant Shelby L. Haynes.
In 2013, doctors performing a gallbladder removal surgery on Shelby Haynes injured her, necessitating a second surgery three days later. Haynes incurred $312,286.50 in medical expenses as a result, and her insurer—Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund (together with its trustee, Charles Whobrey, "Central States")—footed the bill. Haynes, represented by Butler, Cincione & DiCuccio, subsequently sued the doctors that performed the first surgery and the hospital where they performed it. In 2017, the parties settled that lawsuit for $1,500,000 and Haynes's law firm accepted a mailed check on her behalf.
After the settlement, Haynes and her counsel refused to reimburse Central States the amount it previously covered for her, so Central States sued them under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) alleging it had an equitable lien on the settlement fund held by the firm and seeking to impose a constructive trust on it. The parties cross-moved for summary judgment in early 2019 arguing the material facts are undisputed therefore entitling them to judgment as a matter of law. (Dkt. 96, 102.) Because the terms of the health insurance contract—including the reimbursement provision—bind Haynes, and neither she nor her attorneys can assert any equitable defense consistent with the contract, the Court grants Central States' motion (Dkt. 96), denies the defendants' cross-motion (Dkt. 102), and enters summary judgment for Central States.
On December 11, 2013, 18-year-old Shelby Haynes underwent surgery at Bon Secours Kentucky Health Systems in Ashland, Kentucky to remove her gallbladder. (Dkt. 108 ¶ 11; Dkt. 113 ¶ 8.) During that surgery, Haynes sustained an injury to her common bile duct (a tube that connects to the gallbladder). (Dkt. 113 ¶ 9.) On December 14, 2013, Haynes had a second surgery performed on her at the University of Kentucky Medical Center to repair the damage to her common bile duct. (Dkt. 108 ¶ 12; Dkt. 113 ¶ 10.) Haynes incurred $312,286.50 in medical expenses because the first surgery went wrong. (Dkt. 108 ¶ 13.) Central States paid out health insurance benefits for this treatment because Haynes was a covered beneficiary under her father's ERISA-governed employee welfare plan. (Dkt. 108 ¶¶ 14, 29, 32; Dkt. 110 ¶ 2; Dkt. 113 ¶ 4.)
Central States annually provides every participant in the Plan—including Haynes and her father—with a Summary of Benefits and Coverage (SBC) because federal law requires it to. (Dkt. 121 ¶ 2.) The SBC describes the participants' coverage and gives them information on how to obtain a copy of the Plan, which is readily available online and can also be supplied in writing. Id.
Central States also sends all new enrollees a copy of the Summary Plan Description (SPD) along with their enrollment form. Id. ¶ 3. With respect to the enrollment form, Central States received a version signed by Haynes's father in August 2008, in which he elected coverage for himself and his family, including Haynes. Id. ¶ 5. In addition to sending the SPD upon enrollment, Central States periodically distributes copies of the SPD as the law requires it to. Id.
Both Shelby Haynes and her father do not dispute receiving the SPD, although they never received a copy of the Plan. Id. Central States' records indicate that it sent Haynes's father a copy of the SPD in June 2008 and then again in November 2013. Id. ¶ 4. The SPD states that " ‘[a]ll information in this booklet ... is subject to the terms of the actual Health and Welfare Plan document.’ " Id. ¶ 10. It also asserts that "[t]he Plan has a full right of subrogation and/or reimbursement each time you and/or one or more of your covered dependents receive benefit payments by the Plan for any physical or mental condition or injury that was or may have been caused by any person." Id. ¶ 11. The SPD continues, declaring: Id.
For its part, the Plan itself states the following regarding subrogation and reimbursement:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
States v. Haynes, No. 19-2589
...The district judge disagreed with her and granted summary judgment to the Fund for the full amount of its outlay. 397 F. Supp. 3d 1149 (N.D. Ill. 2019). Along the way, the district court enjoined Haynes, Haynes’s malpractice lawyer, and the lawyer’s firm from dissipating the proceeds of the......
-
Vendavo, Inc. v. Long
... ... Case No. 19-cv-1725 United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division ... "pain points." These pain points consist of areas in which a company is "falling short," for ... ...
-
Publix Super Mkts. v. Figareau
...injury and therapy. (Dkt. 93-9 at p. 3 ¶ 9). Defendants do not refute this evidence. See Cent. States, Se. & Sw. Areas Health & Welfare Fund v. Haynes, 397 F. Supp. 3d 1149, 1164 (N.D. Ill. 2019), aff'd, 966 F.3d 655 (7th Cir. 2020) (noting that "[s]ubstantiating [a plan fiduciary's] figure......
-
Colorescience, Inc. v. Bouche
...money from a third party, the basis for the fiduciary's claim is equitable." Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund v. Haynes, 397 F. Supp. 3d 1149, 1156 (N.D. Ill. 2019) (citing Montanile v. Bd. of Trustees of Nat. Elevator Indus. Health Benefit Plan, 577 U.S......
-
Weekly Case Digests September 14, 2020 September 18, 2020.
...to a beneficiary). The district judge disagreed with her and granted summary judgment to the Fund for the full amount of its outlay. 397 F. Supp. 3d 1149 (N.D. Ill. 2019). Along the way, the district court enjoined Haynes, Haynes's malpractice lawyer, and the lawyer's firm from dissipating ......
-
ERISA Repayment Clause Covered Dependent.
...to a beneficiary). The district judge disagreed with her and granted summary judgment to the Fund for the full amount of its outlay. 397 F. Supp. 3d 1149 (N.D. Ill. 2019). Along the way, the district court enjoined Haynes, Haynes's malpractice lawyer, and the lawyer's firm from dissipating ......