People v. Bloeth
| Decision Date | 02 March 1961 |
| Citation | 213 N.Y.S.2d 51,173 N.E.2d 782,9 N.Y.2d 211 |
| Parties | , 173 N.E.2d 782 PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Francis Henry BLOETH, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
John B. Clarke, Peter V. Snyder, Smithtown Branch, and Morton M. Sider, for appellant.
John P. Cohalan, Jr., Riverhead, for respondent.
The judgment is affirmed under section 542 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which directs us to give judgment without regard to technical errors which do not affect the defendant's substantial rights. The proof of guilt here was overwhelming. At one point in his lengthy charge to the jury the Judge gave an explanation of section 1120 of the Penal Law, Consol.Laws, c. 40, which used the words 'and/or' instead of 'or' but this was not detrimental to defendant, especially since the New York law as to the defense of insanity was accurately stated in other parts of the charge.
At another place in the instructions to the jury the court used language which could be interpreted to mean that to destroy the effect of a confession the jury had to be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the confession was involuntary. The burden of proof was, of course, on the People not on defendant but in view of the immediately preceding instructions on this same subject we do not believe that the statement made by the court was prejudicial to defendant's position. As to the confession itself, there was at most a question of fact as to whether it was obtained by force or other wrong. On this record the jury could reasonably find that defendant confessed voluntarily and in response to the advice of his wife and his attorney.
Judgment of conviction affirmed, pursuant to section 542 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Rodriguez
...v. Everett, 10 N.Y.2d 500, 225 N.Y.S.2d 193, 180 N.E.2d 556), or allegedly coerced or beaten into confessing (People v. Bloeth, 9 N.Y.2d 211, 213 N.Y.S.2d 51, 173 N.E.2d 782), have all been held to have been merely factors for submission to the jury for their consideration in passing upon t......
-
United States v. Denno
...was convicted on May 14, 1960 and this conviction was unanimously affirmed by the New York Court of Appeals. People v. Bloeth (1961) 9 N.Y.2d 211, 213 N.Y.S.2d 51, 173 N.E. 2d 782. On March 30, 1961 leave to reargue was denied by the New York Court of Appeals but the remittitur was amended ......
-
People v. Warren
...principle that the charge as a whole must be considered is an elementary one, required by CPL 470.05 (1) (see, People v. Bloeth, 9 N.Y.2d 211, 213, 213 N.Y.S.2d 51, 173 N.E.2d 782; see also, People v. Russell, 266 N.Y. 147, 153, 194 N.E. 65), and has been applied in at least one other conte......
-
United States v. Denno
...and sentenced on May 18, 1960 to be executed, judgment affirmed by the New York Court of Appeals March 2, 1961, People v. Bloeth, 9 N.Y.2d 211, 213 N.Y.S.2d 51, 173 N.E.2d 782, remittitur amended 9 N.Y.2d 823, 215 N.Y.S.2d 769, 175 N.E. 2d 347, certiorari denied October 9, 1961, 368 U.S. 86......