Moore v. Vanderburg

Citation90 N.C. 10
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decision Date28 February 1884
PartiesR. D. MOORE v. JULIUS VANDERBURG and others.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

SPECIAL PROCEEDING heard at Fall Term, 1883, of IREDELL Superior Court, before Gudger, J.

The defendants appealed.

Mr. D. M. Furches, for plaintiff .

Messrs. E. C. Smith and Fuller & Snow, for defendants .

MERRIMON, J.

It appears from the record sent to this court, that, at August term, 1883, of the superior court of Iredell county, that court affirmed the judgment of the clerk confirming the sale of the land mentioned in the pleadings. It does not, however, appear that any appeal has been taken from the judgment to this court, or that any notice of appeal was given or waived.

It is therefore manifest that the case is not properly in this court. The appeal is the essential means by which this court gets jurisdiction of an action, and it must certainly appear in the record that it was taken from a proper judgment, authorizing it. It is the appeal that puts this court in relation with the case in the court below, and with that court in respect to the judgment appealed from; and this court must be able to see, from the record, the relation thus established. The court will always be careful to see that it has jurisdiction; this is essential to enable it to take any action whatsoever, and to give any effect to its judgment. Indeed, there can be no judgment without jurisdiction, and there can be no jurisdiction without an appeal or some proceeding, or writ, in substitution therefor. This is so upon principle, b??t it is, as well, required by the statute. THE CODE, § 550, requires that “within the time prescribed in the preceding section (in reference to appeals) the appellant shall cause his appeal to be entered by the clerk on the judgment docket, and notice thereof to be given to the adverse party.” The entry of appeal thus required is indispensable, and, although according to the loose practice that too generally prevails, a mere memorandum that an appeal was taken is all that is entered, strictly and properly it ought to be set out formally in apt words, that the appellant, at the time specified, took an appeal from the judgment in the record; and such entry, however informally expressed, becomes a part of the record to be sent into this court. Section 551 requires that “the clerk, on receiving a copy of the case settled, as required in the preceding section, shall make a copy of the judgment-roll and of the case, and within...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Dogwood Dev. & Mgmt. v. White Oak Transport
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • March 7, 2008
    ...appellate division with the trial division and confers upon the appellate court the authority to act in a particular case.3 Moore v. Vanderburg, 90 N.C. 10, 10 (1884) ("The appeal is the essential means by which this court gets jurisdiction of an action.... It is the appeal that puts this c......
  • Mason v. Moore County Bd. Of Com'rs, 594.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • December 15, 1948
    ...authority to consider the questions attempted to be presented. Instead, the purported appeal must be dismissed. Moore v. Vanderburg, 90 N.C. 10; Spence v. Tapscott, 92 N.C. 576; McCoy v. Lassiter, 94 N.C. 131; Brooks v. Austin, 94 N.C. 222; Randleman Manufacturing Co. v. Simmons, 97 N.C. 89......
  • Mason v. Moore County Bd. of Com'rs
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • December 15, 1948
    ... ... Walton v ... McKesson, 101 N.C. 428, 7 S.E. 566, 569. Without them, ... this Court has no jurisdiction and is without authority to ... consider the questions attempted to be presented. Instead, ... the purported appeal must be dismissed. Moore v ... Vanderburg, 90 N.C. 10; Spence v. Tapscott, 92 ... N.C. 576; McCoy v. Lassiter, 94 N.C. 131; Brooks ... v. Austin, 94 N.C. 222; Randleman Manufacturing Co ... v. Simmons, 97 N.C. 89, 1 S.E. 923; Walton v. McKesson, ... supra; Howell v. Jones, 109 N.C. 102, 13 S.E. 889; ... Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v ... ...
  • State v. King
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • May 4, 2021
    ...upon the appellate court the authority to act in a particular case." Dogwood , 362 N.C. at 197, 657 S.E.2d at 364-65 ; see Moore v. Vanderburg , 90 N.C. 10, 10 (1884) ("The appeal is the essential means by which this court gets jurisdiction of an action ... It is the appeal that puts this c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT