Humane Soc. of US v. Brown
Decision Date | 18 August 1995 |
Docket Number | Slip Op. 95-148. Court No. 95-05-00631. |
Citation | 901 F. Supp. 338,19 CIT 1104 |
Parties | The HUMANE SOCIETY OF the UNITED STATES, Humane Society International, Defenders of Wildlife, Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society, and Earth Island Institute, Plaintiffs, v. Ron BROWN, Secretary of Commerce, and Warren Christopher, Secretary of State, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. Court of International Trade |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund (Patti A. Goldman) for plaintiffs.
Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General; Lois J. Schiffer, Acting Assistant Attorney General; David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division (Jeffrey M. Telep) and Environment & Natural Resources Division (James C. Kilbourne, Christiana P. Perry and Mark A. Brown), U.S. Department of Justice; and Office of the Legal Advisor, U.S. Department of State (David Balton) and Office of General Counsel, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Margaret F. Hayes), of counsel, for defendants.
Alleging continuing large-scale driftnet fishing in the Mediterranean Sea by fishermen from Italy in defiance of international, European and American law, the above-named plaintiffs come to this Court of International Trade with a complaint styled as one for declaratory and injunctive relief and accompanied by voluminous papers entitled Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. The defendants oppose that application for immediate relief and have interposed motions of their own, the first to dismiss the complaint and the others for relief from discovery already requested by the plaintiffs.
A hearing was held in open court on August 1, 1995 on the respective motions.
For the purposes of a motion to dismiss, the material allegations of a complaint are taken as admitted and are to be liberally construed in favor of the plaintiff(s). E.g., Jenkins v. McKeithen, 395 U.S. 411, 421-22, 89 S.Ct. 1843, 1848-49, 23 L.Ed.2d 404 reh'g denied, 396 U.S. 869, 90 S.Ct. 35, 24 L.Ed.2d 123 (1969), and cases cited therein.
Id., para. 7. Supporters of the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society, which is also headquartered in England, "are harmed by the diminishing numbers of dolphins and whales in and around the Mediterranean Sea as a result of large-scale driftnet fishing in the area." Id., para. 8. A similar claim is made on behalf of Earth Island Institute and some 30,000 members. See id., para. 9.
The defendants are being sued in their official capacities as U.S. Secretary of Commerce and Secretary of State, respectively. Each is averred to have responsibilities under the High Seas Driftnet Fisheries Enforcement Act, Pub.L. No. 102-582, 106 Stat. 4900 (Nov. 2, 1992).
Similar description is contained in the report to Congress in support of adoption of the Enforcement Act. See, e.g., H.R.Rep. 262, Part 1, 102d Cong., 2d Sess. 4 (Oct. 22, 1992), U.S.C.C.A.N. 1992, p. 4090 ().
The plaintiffs accuse Italians of continuing to engage in such carnage. Their complaint states:
The complaint points to resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly adopted on December 22, 1989, No. 44-225, recommending that countries impose a moratorium by June 30, 1992 on the use of large-scale driftnets beyond the exclusive economic zone of any nation, and on December 20, 1991, No. 46-215, calling for the moratorium to be globally implemented by December 31, 1992, including enclosed and semi-enclosed seas. The plaintiffs also point to a January 27, 1992 regulation of the European Economic Community, No. 345/92, which was adopted to implement the U.N. moratorium and which prohibits vessels from keeping on board or using driftnets exceeding 2.5 kilometers in length.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Salmon Spawning & Recovery Alliance v. Basham
... ... are taken as admitted and are to be liberally construed in favor of the plaintiff(s)." Humane Soc'y v. Brown, 19 CIT 1104, 1104, 901 F.Supp. 338, 340 (1995). However, ... ...
-
Humane Soc. of U.S. v. Clinton
... ... Schiffer, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice (Lucius B. Lau), Eileen Sobeck, Chief, Environment and Natural Resources Division Wildlife and Marine Resources Section (Mark A. Brown), Violanda Botet, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Advisor, United States Department of State, of counsel, Margaret F. Hayes, Assistant General Counsel for Fisheries National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, United States Department of Commerce, of counsel, for Defendants ... ...
- Humane Soc. of US v. Brown, Slip Op. 96-38. Court No. 95-05-00631.
-
Native Federation v. Bozovich Timber, Slip Op. 07-57.
... ... Page 1182 ... Id. at 189, 108 S.Ct. 950; see also Earth Island Inst. v. Brown, 28 F.3d 76, 77 (9th Cir.1994) ("[T]he [K Mart] Court made it clear that the term `embargo' does ... and their parts and products, of Taiwan ... "); Humane Soc'y of the United States v. Brown, 19 CIT 1104, 901 F.Supp. 338 (1995) (High Seas Driftnet ... ...