H&P Invs. v. iLux Capital Mgmt. LLC

Decision Date28 October 2021
Docket NumberNo. 20190548-CA,20190548-CA
Citation500 P.3d 906
Parties H&P INVESTMENTS, Homer K. Cutrubus, and Phidia Cutrubus, Appellees, v. ILUX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, Fortius Financial Advisors LLC, Roberto G. Buchanan, and Jeff M. Bollinger, Appellants.
CourtUtah Court of Appeals

Troy L. Booher, Beth E. Kennedy, Salt Lake City, and Dick J. Baldwin, Attorneys for Appellants

James C. Lewis and Chase Kimball, Salt Lake City, Attorneys for Appellees

Judge David N. Mortensen authored this Opinion, in which Judges Gregory K. Orme and Michele M. Christiansen Forster concurred.

Opinion

MORTENSEN, Judge:

¶1 H&P Investments, Homer K. Cutrubus, and Phidia Cutrubus (collectively, H&P) brought a claim for breach of contract after it received 17,557 shares of Facebook stock, rather than the 20,000 shares for which H&P believed it had contracted. The claim was tried to the bench. The district court found in H&P's favor, and its ruling on the merits is not challenged on appeal. Instead, this appeal concerns various rulings related to the damages the court awarded—central among them being the court's conclusion about when H&P learned of the breach, which determined the value of damages attributable to the missing 2,443 shares—along with its assessment of personal liability against two agents of the principal defendants, Fortius Financial Advisors LLC (Fortius) and iLux Capital Management LLC (iLux) (collectively, the Investment Companies). We reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND

¶2 Facebook filed for an initial public offering (IPO) in February 2012, and it was "expected to be one of the largest in history." The Investment Companies learned of an opportunity to acquire shares of Facebook prior to the IPO but believed that to convince the owner to sell, they needed to be able to offer to purchase a substantial number of shares. They thought that combining money from numerous investors through a pooled investment vehicle would be an optimal way to do so.

¶3 To that end, they formed the iLux Secondary Market Fund LP (the Fund), with iLux acting as the general partner of the Fund and the investors acting as limited partners. The terms and conditions of investing in the Fund were contained in a lengthy private placement memorandum (PPM). The PPM indicated that the Fund was a vehicle for a variety of investments, not just Facebook, and thus any investor would be purchasing shares in the Fund rather than purchasing shares of Facebook (or any other particular stock). Other terms noted that each investor would have a "capital account," where each individual investor's funds would be placed, including each investor's contributions and pro-rata share of any stocks purchased or other proceeds generated. The PPM further specified that, unless waived by the general partner, there was a "one-year lockup period," meaning that investors had to wait one year from the time of their admission to the Fund before they could withdraw anything from their capital account.

¶4 In March 2012, Roberto G. Buchanan, an investment advisor with the Investment Companies, reached out to Homer Cutrubus (Cutrubus) to see if he would be interested in the opportunity to buy some Facebook shares. Cutrubus indicated that he was interested in purchasing 20,000 shares, depending on the price, through H&P, a company he owned with his brother, Phidia. After several communications, H&P committed to investing in April 2012 by tendering $868,140 to iLux and the Fund. However, H&P and the Investment Companies had different ideas about the terms of that investment.

¶5 For its part, H&P believed it was simply purchasing 20,000 shares of Facebook stock directly from the Investment Companies at a set price of $41.34 per share, along with a 5% management fee. Early on, Buchanan told Cutrubus that he thought the Investment Companies would strike a deal with a seller for $38 per share but that this was a "moving target." However, Buchanan eventually told Cutrubus that the Facebook shares had been "secured" and that H&P would have to commit to the purchase of 20,000 shares at that time. Buchanan specified that the price per share would be $41.34, for a total purchase price of $826,800, but that there would also be a 5% management fee of $41,340, for a total investment of $868,140. And when H&P tendered the $868,140 in two checks on May 7, 2012—the first for the purchase price and the second for the management fee—Phidia Cutrubus made a note on each check, reading,

First Check:
"20,000 SHARES of FACEBOOK
at 41.34 = 826,800.00"
Second Check:
"20,000 shares FACEBOOK
at 41.34 = 826,800.00.
826,800.00 x 5% = 41,340.00
TO COVER MANAGEMENT FEE"

¶6 On the other hand, the Investment Companies believed that H&P had simply signed on to be an investor in the Fund—meaning that H&P had contracted to receive only a pro-rata share of the stocks eventually acquired at whatever price. This belief was based on the fact that Buchanan had sent the PPM to H&P in the course of negotiations and, at some point during these discussions, Cutrubus signed the acknowledgment pages at the end of it.

¶7 The Investment Companies apparently had every intention of reaching an agreement with a seller to acquire Facebook shares at $41.34 per share, but this deal collapsed just days before Facebook's IPO occurred on May 18, 2012. The Investment Companies scrambled to find another seller and eventually locked in a sale and purchased a substantial number of Facebook shares. However, the price per share was not the anticipated $41.34, but was instead $47.02.

¶8 To make matters worse, after the IPO, Facebook's stock did not initially perform as anticipated. As a result, iLux sent various updates to investors of the Fund—including H&P—regarding the performance of the Facebook stock and related action the Fund was taking with respect to the stock. For example, in early November 2012, iLux sent an email indicating,

Currently, [Facebook] is trading at approximately $22/share .... [Although] limited partners of the Fund were required to remain limited partners of the Fund for at least one year ..., the General Partner has made the decision to distribute the shares of [Facebook] in-kind to all limited partners prior to the expiration of the [limited partner lockup period]. This will ... give each limited partner direct control over their pro rata shares of [Facebook] shares that the Fund purchased .... The General Partner intends to distribute all shares of [Facebook] in the Fund to the limited partners. In order to expedite the process, we ask that you provide us with the information to transfer your pro rata portion of [Facebook] shares to your brokerage account ....

¶9 On December 11, 2012, iLux sent H&P a follow-up letter with specifics about its investment. As is relevant, this letter stated,

As an investor in the Fund, your pro rata share of the in kind distribution is 17,557 shares .... Please note that your capital account balance for Q2 and Q3 include your pro rata ownership of Facebook. Your Q4 capital account balance will reflect the distribution of the Facebook shares which will result in a corresponding decrease to your capital account balance. For your records, the adjusted cost basis per share is $47.02 .

(Emphasis added.) Cutrubus immediately called Buchanan and told him that he wanted "all [H&P's] shares of stock, because [17,557 shares] was short" by 2,443 shares. Buchanan apparently responded that the 17,557 shares were the shares that were "available" but that "they were still distributing the shares, and they still had an audit before the capital accounts were settled." This answer did not "satisfy" Cutrubus; nevertheless, he came away with "the expectation that [H&P] would receive [its] shares." A few days later, H&P received the 17,557 shares mentioned in the letter.

¶10 In March 2013, Cutrubus again spoke to Buchanan over the phone about the remaining 2,443 shares. Cutrubus apparently told Buchanan that H&P had "contracted to buy 20,000 shares, and it was ... on [the] check, and just like any stock purchase, ... if [the Investment Companies] weren't able to buy it for that, then they shouldn't have bought it because [H&P] only agreed to pay what [it] paid. And so [it] wanted ... the balance of [its] shares." On March 20, Buchanan forwarded an email to Cutrubus from Jeff M. Bollinger (a manager at both Fortius and iLux) in an effort to provide "information on the questions [he] had." That email explained that iLux had found a seller at $42 per share in early March 2012, but that it was canceled by Facebook just prior to the IPO, and that iLux had then scrambled to find the eventual deal at $47.02 per share. Bollinger also stated, "As you know, we have sent out the shares of Facebook to all the Limited Partners in December. ... We will be making the final capital account distributions on the 1 year anniversary, which is coming up in May."

¶11 Months later, on September 11, 2013, Bollinger sent Cutrubus another email to address his "questions on the share distribution" and about "any remaining cash" in H&P's capital account. The email went on to again explain how the original deal "was canceled by Facebook" and that iLux had to scramble to find another deal. That email also stated,

We are in the process of closing out the fund and will be distributing the remaining cash to you. I am waiting to hear from the administrators the exact amount, it should be around $27,000 in addition to the 17,557 shares that were sent to you previously. You will be getting a final capital account statement shortly, and will have an independent audit performed for your review.

¶12 After reading Bollinger's email, on September 17, 2013, Cutrubus wrote a letter to Buchanan in response. In pertinent part, that letter stated,

On numerous occasions we have discussed the fact that you have not forwarded all the shares [H&P] purchased in Facebook. ...
While [I] understand you had established [the Fund] to purchase these shares, please be reminded [H&P's] interest was solely in
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Kelly v. Timber Lakes Prop. Owners Ass'n
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • 17 Febrero 2022
    ...the applicability of the plain error doctrine in those cases. See, e.g. , H&P Invs. v. iLux Cap. Mgmt. LLC , 2021 UT App 113, ¶ 21 n.2, 500 P.3d 906 ; Freight Tec Mgmt. Group Inc. v. Chemex Inc. , 2021 UT App 92, ¶ 39 n.11, 499 P.3d 894 ; Miner v. Miner , 2021 UT App 77, ¶ 11 n.3, 496 P.3d ......
  • Diversified Striping Sys. Inc. v. Kraus
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • 21 Julio 2022
    ...faith or committed a tort in connection with the performance of the contract.’ " H&P Invs. v. iLux Cap. Mgmt. LLC , 2021 UT App 113, ¶ 50, 500 P.3d 906 (quoting Reedeker v. Salisbury , 952 P.2d 577, 582 (Utah Ct. App. 1998) ). When the district court imposed joint and several liability for ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT