Carriers Container Council, Inc. v. Mobile S.S. Ass'n. Inc., AFL-CIO

Decision Date22 June 1990
Docket Number89-7451 and 89-7505,Nos. 89-7279,PMTA-ILA,AFL-CIO,I,AFL-CI,MSSA-ILA,s. 89-7279
Citation904 F.2d 28
PartiesCARRIERS CONTAINER COUNCIL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross Appellee, v. MOBILE STEAMSHIP ASSOC. INC.-International Longshoreman's Assoc.,Pension Plan and Trust and its trustees F.D. Alspaugh, Arthur W. Stratton, Hartwell Ludlow, Ned Mattingly, Felix Cleveland, Henry L. Clarke, Albert Walton, Jr., Seymour Irby, Defendants-Appellees, Cross Appellants. CARRIERS CONTAINER COUNCIL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MOBILE STEAMSHIP ASSOCIATION, INC., International Longshoreman's Assoc.,Pension Plan and Trust and its trustees, F.D. Alspaugh, Arthur W. Stratton, Hartwell Ludlow, Ned Mattingly, Felix Cleveland, et al., Defendants-Appellants. MOBILE STEAMSHIP ASSOCIATION,Pension Plan & Welfare Plans,Local 1985 Maintenance Employees' Pension Plan,Pension Fund,Welfare Fund, Supplemental Unemployment Compensation Benefit Plan, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CARRIER'S CONTAINER COUNCIL, INC., Defendant-Appellant, International Longshoreman's Association,ntervenor-Defendant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit

Wesley Pipes, Lyons, Pipes & Cook, P.C., Mobile, Ala., Peter C. Lambos, Constantine P. Lambos, Conato Caruso, Lambos & Giardino, New York City, Carriers Container Council.

William B. Harvey, Armbrecht, Jackson, DeMouy, Crowe, Holmes & Reeves, Edward A. Dean, Michael A. Figures, Figures, Jackson & Harris, Mobile, Ala., for Mobile Steamship Assoc., et al.

Paul Myrick, Frank McRight, McRight, Jackson, Myrick & Moore, Michael A. Figures, Figures, Jackson & Harris, Mobile, Ala., for Mobile Steamship Assn., et al.

J. Cecil Gardner, Gardner, Middlebrooks & Fleming, P.C., Mobile, Ala., for ILA Local 1985, et al.

William B. Harvey, Edward A. Dean, Armbrecht, Jackson, DeMouy, Crowe, Holmes & Reeves, Mobile, Ala., for MSSA-ILA Pension Plan, et al.

Francis A. Scanlan, Scanlan & Scanlan, P.C., Stanley B. Gruber, Freedman & Lorry, P.C., Philadelphia, Pa., for Trustees of the PMTA-ILA Pension Fund, et al.

Ernest L. Mathews, New York City, for ILA, AFL-CIO amicus curiae.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama; William Brevard Hand and Charles R. Butler, JJ.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion March 22, 1990, 11th Cir., 1990, 896 F.2d 1330)

Before KRAVITCH and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges, and TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge:

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Vernon v. Resolution Trust Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • August 3, 1990
    ...is subject to de novo review by this court. Carriers Container Council, Inc. v. Mobile S.S. Assoc., 896 F.2d 1330, 1337, modified, 904 F.2d 28 (11th Cir.1990). The parties have simplified this task for us in that neither side disputes the facts recited by the other, and none of the facts co......
  • Mary Helen Coal Corp v. Hudson
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • October 31, 2000
    ...1990); Carriers Containers Council, Inc. v. Mobile S.S. Ass'n, 896 F.2d 1330, 1343 (11th Cir. 1990), amended on reh'g in part by 904 F.2d 28 (11th Cir. 1990); Imel v. Laborers Pension Trust Fund for N. Cal., 904 F.2d 1327, 1331 (9th Cir. 1990). Although Title I of ERISA contains a definitio......
  • Jimenez v. Peninsular & Oriental Steam Nav. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • March 3, 1992
    ...Container Council, Inc. v. Mobile S.S. Ass'n, 896 F.2d 1330, 1337, 1339 (11th Cir.) (non-maritime federal common law), as amended, 904 F.2d 28, cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 308, 112 L.Ed.2d 261 (1990); cf. ITT Corp. v. LTX Corp., 926 F.2d 1258, 1261 (1st Cir.1991) (diversity case ......
  • Twin Const., Inc. v. Boca Raton, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • March 1, 1991
    ...favorable to the party opposing the motion. Carriers Container Council, Inc. v. Mobile S.S. Assoc., 896 F.2d 1330, 1337, modified, 904 F.2d 28 (11th Cir.1990). III. A. The development of the D'Oench doctrine and its codification demonstrate that appellant's first three contentions must fail......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT