91 F.3d 156 (9th Cir. 1996), 95-30375, U.S. v. McGinley

Docket Nº:95-30375.
Citation:91 F.3d 156
Party Name:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathan Michael McGINLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Case Date:July 29, 1996
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 156

91 F.3d 156 (9th Cir. 1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Jonathan Michael McGINLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-30375.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

July 29, 1996

Submitted June 25, 1996. [*]

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon (Eugene), No. CR-91-60012-1-REJ; Robert E. Jones, District Judge, Presiding.

D.Or.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, Circuit Judge and SCHWARZER [**], District Judge.

ORDER [***]

Following a remand for resentencing, McGinley was resentenced, and the trial court gave its statement of reasons for the sentence, pursuant to the remand. The court failed, however, to enter a judgment. We have no jurisdiction of the appeal until a judgment is entered. If, after a judgment is entered in the District Court, a further appeal is perfected, this panel will take jurisdiction of that appeal. This appeal is dismissed.

DISMISSED.


Notes:

[*] The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission on the record and briefs and without...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP