U.S. v. Gault

Decision Date12 July 1996
Docket NumberNo. 95-2196,95-2196
Citation92 F.3d 990
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony GAULT, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit

Richard A. Friedman, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., (John J. Kelly, United States Attorney; Charles L. Barth, Assistant United States Attorney, Albuquerque, New Mexico, with him on the briefs), for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Joseph W. Gandert, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Albuquerque, New Mexico, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before BALDOCK, HENRY and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Defendant Anthony Gault's Petition for Rehearing with Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is denied. The majority and concurring opinions filed on June 4, 1996, in this matter are withdrawn and the accompanying unanimous opinion is substituted therefore.

It is hereby ordered that the petition for rehearing is DENIED, the suggestion for rehearing en banc is DENIED, and the Opinion filed on June 4, 1996, is WITHDRAWN. The Opinion accompanying this Order shall be filed by the Clerk of Court. The judgment entered June 4, 1996 remains effective.

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant was charged with possession of phencyclidine (PCP) with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). At a pre-trial hearing, the district court granted defendant's motion to suppress evidence seized after a search of defendant's gym bag. We reverse.

On April 3, 1995, DEA agent Kevin Small boarded an Amtrak train stopped in Albuquerque, New Mexico, en route to Chicago from Los Angeles. Agent Small, looking for evidence of drug trafficking, noticed a zippered nylon gym bag on the floor in front of aisle seat number 29. The bag, which appeared to be new, protruded into the aisle approximately five inches. His interest piqued, Small kicked and lifted the bag to determine its weight. He testified that the bag was heavy, which in his experience was consistent with the presence of drugs. Small then knelt down and sniffed the seam of the bag to see if he could detect an odor of marijuana coming from the bag. He testified that he smelled ether, which is used in the manufacture of PCP.

When the defendant, Anthony Gault, re-boarded the train and sat down in seat number 29, Small approached him and initiated a conversation. After identifying himself as a DEA agent, Small asked the defendant his destination and where he had boarded the train. Thereafter, Small asked Gault for consent to search his bag. When Gault refused, Small asked if he could smell the bag. Gault, unaware of Small's previous sniff of the bag, responded, "Go ahead, smell." After kneeling down to smell the bag, Agent Small advised Gault that he was going to detain the bag and attempt to obtain a warrant to search it. Small told Gault that he would mail the bag to him if no evidence of contraband was found.

Small then obtained a warrant to search the bag, which was found to contain six whiskey bottles filled with PCP. Gault was subsequently arrested when his train stopped in Las Vegas, New Mexico, and thereafter charged with possession of PCP with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). At a pre-trial hearing, the district court granted the defendant's motion to suppress the PCP on the grounds that Agent Small's kicking and lifting of Gault's bag constituted an unlawful search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The district court held that Gault had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his bag based on the fact that the bag was placed directly in front of his seat and not in the common baggage area or overhead compartment. Conceding that Gault had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the air surrounding his bag, the district court nevertheless held that any evidence obtained as a result of the initial...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • United States v. Easley
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • January 10, 2018
    ...on the floor in front of a train seat, and protruding into the aisle, did not constitute a search." Id. at 636–37 (citing U.S. v. Gault , 92 F.3d 990 (10th Cir. 1996) ). The thrust of the analysis is whether the government officer's "manner of handling the bag was the sort that a traveler l......
  • Lavan v. City of Los Angeles
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • September 5, 2012
    ...bags, and other containers from its sidewalks that may conceal bombs, weapons, biohazards, or drugs. See, e.g., United States v. Gault, 92 F.3d 990, 992 (10th Cir.1996) (reasoning that the defendant's “expectation was not objectively reasonable” where he “left his bag unattended, with no on......
  • State v. Juarez-Godinez
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • August 21, 1997
    ...in a public place is not a search under the Fourth Amendment and, hence, requires no justification whatsoever. 16 United States v. Gault, 92 F.3d 990, 992 (10th Cir.) (no search when dog sniff performed on moving train), cert den. --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 321, 136 L.Ed.2d 236 (1996); United......
  • United States v. Muhtorov
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • December 8, 2021
    ...hearing, see, e.g. , United States v. Ceballos , 385 F.3d 1120, 1124 (7th Cir. 2004), plain smell, see, e.g. , United States v. Gault , 92 F.3d 990, 992 (10th Cir. 1996), and plain feel, see, e.g. , United States v. Campbell , 549 F.3d 364, 373 (6th Cir. 2008). Overall, "[t]he plain view do......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT