933 F.2d 798 (9th Cir. 1991), 88-15661, Cooper v. Dupnik

Docket Nº:88-15661, 88-15685.
Citation:933 F.2d 798
Party Name:Michael COOPER, husband, in his own capacity and as parent of Abram and Adam Cooper, minors; Lidia Cooper, wife, in her own capacity and as parent of Abram Cooper and Adam Cooper, minors, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Clarence DUPNIK, Sheriff, Pima County; Tom Taylor, an employee of Pima County Sheriff's Department; Weaver Barkman, an employee of Pima C
Case Date:May 23, 1991
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 798

933 F.2d 798 (9th Cir. 1991)

Michael COOPER, husband, in his own capacity and as parent

of Abram and Adam Cooper, minors; Lidia Cooper, wife, in

her own capacity and as parent of Abram Cooper and Adam

Cooper, minors, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Clarence DUPNIK, Sheriff, Pima County; Tom Taylor, an

employee of Pima County Sheriff's Department;

Weaver Barkman, an employee of Pima

County Sheriff's Department,

Defendants-Appellants.

Michael COOPER, husband, in his own capacity and as parent

of Abram and Adam Cooper, minors; Lidia Cooper, wife, in

her own capacity and as parent of Abram Cooper and Adam

Cooper, minors, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Clarence DUPNIK, Sheriff, Pima County, Defendant,

and

City of Tucson; Tucson Police Department; Peter Ronstadt;

Karen Wright; Gene Scott; Timothy O'Sullivan;

Kay McCall, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 88-15661, 88-15685.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

May 23, 1991

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; Richard M. Bilby, Chief Judge.

Michael P. Callahan, Deputy County Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for defendants-appellants Clarence Dupnik and Tom Taylor.

David L. Berkman, Murphy, Goering, Roberts & Holt, Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant Weaver Barkman.

David F. Toone, Kimble, Gothreau & Nelson, Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant Peter Ronstadt.

Page 799

Stephen M. Weiss, Karp, Stoklin & Weiss, Winton D. Woods, Michael J. Bloom, Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Prior report: 9th Cir., 924 F.2d 1520.

Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and THOMAS G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP