The Kensington
Decision Date | 25 May 1899 |
Docket Number | 147. |
Citation | 94 F. 885 |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Parties | THE KENSINGTON. |
H. W Ward, for claimants.
Before WALLACE, LACOMBE, and SHIPMAN, Circuit Judges.
On December 2, 1897, the libelants, citizens of the United States, and residents of New Jersey, being at the time in Paris, France, purchased of an agent of the claimant, a New Jersey corporation, a ticket for their passage, from Antwerp to New York by the British steamer Kensington, of the Red Star Line. They proceeded to Antwerp where on December 10th they paid the balance of the purchase money, delivered their trunks to the vessel, and received a baggage check stating that said trunks were shipped 'subject to the conditions contained in the company's ticket and bill of lading. ' The ticket, which is dated December 2, 1897, begins with a recital of the names of the passengers, and numbers of staterooms and berths, and states that it 'is good for second-cabin passage of the persons named in the margin * * * by the British steamship Kensington from Antwerp on the 11th of December, * * * unless prevented from unforseen circumstances, with 20 cubic feet of personal baggage for each adult passenger free of charge, excess being charged for at the rate of 125 francs per cubic foot. ' Immediately succeeding is the caption, 'Notice to Passengers,' and these words, 'It is a condition upon which this ticket is granted, and is mutually agreed for the consideration aforesaid, that'-- Here, as the district judge finds, follow 10 paragraphs in type somewhat smaller than the preceding type, but perfectly clear and legible stating numerous conditions. The whole concludes with the clause: 'All questions arising hereunder are to be settled according to Belgian law, with reference to which this contract is made. ' Then follows the signature, 'John Macklin, for General European Agents. ' The relevant conditions included in the above-mentioned 10 paragraphs are these:
When their baggage was delivered to the company at Antwerp, on December 10th, no statement was made of its value, and no freight was paid on its excess over 250 francs. The trunks were stowed in the after part of what is known as 'No. 2 Upper Steerage Deck.' Upon the arrival of the steamer in New York, it was discovered that the libelants' trunks and baggage of other passengers, which, with some crates of china, had been stowed there, had been broken to pieces, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Smead v. Chandler
-
The New England
...... expressly approved in Worsted Mills v. Knott, 27. C.C.A. 326, 82 F. 471, by the circuit court of appeals for. the Second circuit. A like provision inserted in a. passenger's ticket between Belgium and New York, the. steamer being American, was held void by the same court in. The Kensington, 36 C.C.A. 533, 94 F. 885. See, also, The. Energia (D.C.) 56 F. 602; The Hugo (D.C.) 57 F. 403; The. Glenmavis (D.C.) 69 F. 472. The authority of these cases. outweighs that of The Oranmore (D.C.) 24 F. 922, which was. affirmed in the circuit court, without any statement of. reasons, by Judge ......
-
The Ernestina
...... shipowner to provide a ship proper for the performance of the. duty which he has undertaken. ' The act was thus rather. strictly construed. . . Compare. also Carver's Carriage by Sea, Sec. 103f; The. Chattahooche, 173 U.S. 540, 19 Sup.Ct. 491, 43 L.Ed. 801; The. Kensington (D.C.) 88 F. 331; Id., 94 F. 885, 36 C.C.A. 533;. Id., 183 U.S. 263, 22 Sup.Ct. 102, 46 L.Ed. 190; The. Southwark, 191 U.S. 1, 24 Sup.Ct. 1, 48 L.Ed. 65. . . The. next important decision after the Delaware was The Irrawaddy,. 171 U.S. 187, 18 Sup.Ct. 831, 43 L.Ed. 130 (May 1898). . ......
-
La Bourgogne
...... contract between the shipper and the carrier.'. . . . The. Harter act, Act Feb. 13, 1893, c. 105, 27 Stat. 445, (U.S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2946), is not applicable to the present. situation. . . This. court has decided in the case of The Kensington, 94 F. 885,. 36 C.C.A. 533, that the provisions of the second section of. that act do not apply to passenger tickets. We are also of. the opinion that section 4281 of the United States Revised. Statutes (U.S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2942) is inapplicable. . . In. Wheeler v. O.S.N. Co., ......