Temple University v. White

Citation941 F.2d 201
Decision Date23 September 1991
Docket Number90-1203,Nos. 90-1112,s. 90-1112
Parties, 69 Ed. Law Rep. 1029, 34 Soc.Sec.Rep.Ser. 355, Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 39,527, 2 NDLR P 20 TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John F. WHITE, Jr., Eileen M. Schoen, David S. Feinberg, David D. Ulsh, G. June Hoch, Defendants-Appellants. ALBERT EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER, Allegheny General Hospital, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Episcopal Hospital, Giuffre Medical Center, Magee-Womens Hospital, Mercy Catholic Medical Center-Misericordia Division, Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh, Montefiore Hospital Association of Western Pennsylvania, Inc., Presbyterian University Hospital of Pittsburgh, St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, St. Joseph's Hospital, St. Mary Hospital, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Germantown Hospital and Medical Center v. WHITE, John F., Jr., as Secretary of Public Welfare, Hershock, Michael H., as Secretary of the Budget John F. White, Jr. and Michael H. Hershock, Appellants. FRANKFORD HOSPITAL v. WHITE, Jr., John F., Secretary of Public Welfare, Schoen, Eileen M., Deputy Secretary for Medical Assistance Programs, Feinberg, David S., Director of the Bureau of Policy and Program Development of the Office of Medical Assistance Programs, Ulsh, David D., Acting Director of the Division of Inpatient Programs of the Office of Medical Assistance Programs, and Hershock, Michael H., Secretary of the Budget John F. White, Jr., Eileen M. Schoen, David S. Feinberg, David D. Ulsh and Michael H. Hershock, Appellants. HAHNEMANN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL and Presbyterian Medical Center of Philadelphia, and the Trustees of University of Pennsylvania v. WHITE, John F., Jr., Secretary of Public Welfare, Schoen, Eileen M., Deputy Secretary for Medical Assistance, Feinberg, David S., Director of the Bureau of Policy and Program Development of the Office of Medical Assistance, and Ulsh, David D., Acting Director of the Division of Inpatient Programs of the Office of Medical Assistance and Hershock, Michael H., Secretary of the Budget John F. White, Jr., Eileen M. S
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)

Ernest D. Preate, Jr., Atty. Gen., Kate L. Mershimer, Senior Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), Gwendolyn T. Mosley, Calvin R. Koons, Senior Deputy Attys. Gen., John G. Knorr, III, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Chief, Litigation Section, Office of Atty. Gen. of Pa., Harrisburg, Pa., William D. Lenahan, Asst. Counsel, Dept. of Public Welfare, Harrisburg, Pa., for appellants John F. White, Jr., Eileen M. Schoen, David S. Feinberg and David D. Ulsh.

Matthew M. Strickler (argued), Jenny P. Shulbank, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, George E. Moore, of counsel Temple University, Philadelphia, Pa. for appellee in 90-1112 and 90-1244.

Jeffrey B. Schwartz, David M. Doret, Mark H. Gallant (argued), Alan G. Rosenbloom, Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen, Philadelphia, Pa., for amicus in 90-1112 and 90-1244 and for appellees in 90-1203.

Jennifer A. Stiller (argued), Elizabeth A. Read, Patrick K. McCoyd, Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa. for appellees in 90-1204 and 90-1205.

Roland Morris (argued), Jack M. Mumford, Paula G. Sanders, Duane, Morris & Heckscher, Harrisburg, Pa., for appellees in 90-1206.

Henry W. Sawyer, III (argued), James Eiseman, Jr., Drinker Biddle & Reath, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee Sacred Heart Medical Center in 90-1661.

Before COWEN, ALITO and GARTH, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

GARTH, Circuit Judge:

This set of six consolidated appeals arises from the challenges, raised by over 140 Pennsylvania hospitals, to the validity of Pennsylvania's payment rates that the Commonwealth has set pursuant to its obligations under the Medicaid Program, Title XIX of the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C.A. § 1396 et seq. (1983 & West Supp.1991). The Medicaid Program, as it is described in Pinnacle Nursing Home v. Axelrod, 928 F.2d 1306, 1309 (2d Cir.1991), "establishes a joint federal and state cost-sharing system to provide necessary medical services to indigent persons who otherwise would be unable to afford such care."

Because Pennsylvania participates in the Medicaid Program, it must comply with the federal statutory and regulatory scheme which requires, among other things, that a participating state establish a Medical Assistance Program, ("MAP"), pursuant to which it pays hospitals for their inpatient treatment of Medicaid patients. Wilder v. Virginia Hosp. Ass'n, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 2510, 2513, 110 L.Ed.2d 455 (1990). The hospitals involved in these appeals all claim that Pennsylvania's 1988-1989 payment rates were inadequate to meet the substantive standards of Title XIX, and that the method by which the Commonwealth promulgated those rates did not comply with the requirements of that statute. Accordingly, the plaintiff hospitals argue that Pennsylvania's MAP, which established the 1988-1989 rates, must be voided.

I

Temple University, ("Temple"), brought this § 1983 action in August of 1988, alleging that the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, ("DPW"), was depriving Temple University Hospital of rights secured by Title XIX, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1396 et seq., and the regulations thereunder. 1 Following a bench trial, the district...

To continue reading

Request your trial
166 cases
  • Marland v. Trump
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • 30 Octubre 2020
  • Clark Const. Co., Inc. v. Pena
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Alabama
    • 18 Abril 1996
    ... ... 531, 546 n. 12, 107 S.Ct. 1396, 1404 n. 12, 94 L.Ed.2d 542 (1987) (citing University of Texas v. Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390, 392, 101 S.Ct. 1830, 1832, 68 L.Ed.2d 175 (1981)); see also ... Butts and that the only relief available is equitable in nature." 8 Temple University v. White, 941 F.2d 201, 215 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1032, 112 S.Ct ... ...
  • HEATHER K. BY ANITA K. v. City of Mallard, Iowa
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • 25 Mayo 1995
    ... ... Zatechka, 824 F.Supp. 1360 (D.Neb.1993) (only essential eligibility requirement for university housing by applicant with cerebral palsy was admission to university and application for residence ... the more than 3000 people, most of whom had disabilities, gathered on the South Lawn of the White House for the signing ceremony, President Bush described the ADA as an "historic new civil rights ... Temple Univ. v. White, 941 F.2d 201, 219 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied sub nom. Snider v. Temple Univ., ... ...
  • Curtis 1000, Inc. v. Youngblade, C 94-4117.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of West Virginia
    • 27 Enero 1995
    ... ... Temple Univ. v. White, 941 F.2d 201, 219 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied sub nom. Snider v. Temple Univ., ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Recent Developments in Elder Law- Selected Cases and Legislation 2016
    • United States
    • Connecticut Bar Association Connecticut Bar Journal No. 90, 2017
    • Invalid date
    ...[43] see Kansas Health Care Ass'n, Inc. v. Kansas Dept. of Soc. & Rehab Svcs., 31 F.3d 1536, 1543 (10th Cir. 1994); Temple Univ. v. White, 941 F.2d 201, 215 (3d Cir. 1991); Cal. Med. Ass'n v. Douglas, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2501, *20-21 (C.D. Cal. 2012); Community Pharmacies of Indiana, Inc.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT