Hughes v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co.
| Citation | 945 F.2d 594 |
| Decision Date | 20 December 1991 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 90-3466,CONSOL-PENNSYLVANIA,s. 90-3466 |
| Parties | RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 7843, RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 7886 James E. HUGHES and Linda L. Hughes, Appellant, v.COAL COMPANY, a corporation, Rhein Braun U.S., a corporation, Monongahela Railway Company, a corporation, William Reese, an individual, David Boggs, an individual, Ewing Pollock, an individual, and the law firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas, The Upshur Agency, Inc., Consolidated Coal Co., Consol-Land Development Co., Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft MBH & Rheinische Braunkohlenwerke. Dorothy LOUGHMAN, Appellant, v.COAL COMPANY, a corporation, Rhein Braun U.S., a corporation, Monongahela Railway Company, a corporation, James Leach, an individual, David Boggs, an individual, Ewing Pollock, an individual, and the law firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas, The Upshur Agency, Inc., Consolidated Coal Company, Consol-Land Development Company, Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, MBLT, and Maria Therese Verkaufsgesellschaft, Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, MBH & Rheinische Braunkohlenwerke. Paul H. KENT and Mabel Kent, Appellants, v.COAL COMPANY, a corporation, Rhein Braun U.S., a corporation, Monongahela Railway Company, a corporation, James Leach, an individual, David Boggs, an individual, Ewing Pollock, an individual, and the law firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas, The Upshur Agency, Inc., Consolidated Coal Company, Consol-Land Development Company, Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, MBH & Rheinische Braunkohlenwerke. James C. McINTYRE and Glenna McIntyre, Appellants, v.COAL COMPANY, a corporation, Rhein Braun U.S., a corporation, Monongahela Railway Company, a corporation, Mike Wilson, an individual, James Leach, an individual, David Boggs, an individual, Ewing Pollock, an individual, and the law firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas, The Upshur Agency, Inc., Consolidated Coal Company, Consol-Land Development Company, Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, MBLT and Maria Therese Verkaufsgesellschaft, Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, MBH & Rheinische Braunkohlenwerke. Larry |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit) |
To continue reading
Request your trial
108 cases
-
Yucaipa Am. Alliance Fund I, L.P. v. Ehrlich
... ... "long-term criminal conduct" and the "danger posed by organized crime-type offenses." Hughes v. Consol Penn. Coal Co. , 945 F.2d 594, 611 (3d Cir.1991) (internal quotations and citations ... ...
-
Emcore Corporation v. Price Water House Coopers LLP
... ... Castle , 937 F.2d 868, 875 (3 rd Cir. 1991) and Hughes v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co. , 945 F.2d 594, 611 (3 rd Cir. 1991), it has not permitted ... ...
-
Mruz v. Caring, Inc.
... ... at 240; see, e.g., Hughes v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co., 945 F.2d 594, 609 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 955, ... ...
-
Mathon v. Marine Midland Bank, NA
... ... only goal of alleged racketeering conduct was successful prosecution of a single lawsuit); Hughes v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co., 945 F.2d 594, 610-11 (3d Cir.1991) (no threat of continuity where ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Fraud and Misrepresentation
...York law); Pazdziora ex rel. Pazdziora v. Syntex Labs., 774 F. Supp. 1100, 1103-04 (N.D. Ill. 1991). 47. Hughes v. Consol-Pa. Coal Co., 945 F.2d 594, 616 (3d Cir. 1991) (Pennsylvania law). 178 Business Torts and Unfair Competition Handbook referred to as “actual malice”). 48 A minority perm......
-
Selling Out: an Instrumentalist Theory of Legal Ethics
...suit where the pol-icy limit was intentionally misrepresented to induce a premature settlement); Hughes v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co., 945 F.2d 594, 617 (3d. Cir. 1991) (attorney’s misrepresentation of facts to plaintiff client to obtain favorable prices for other party and failure to dis......