95 1936 La.App. 1 Cir. 9/26/95, Pattan v. Fields
| Decision Date | 26 September 1995 |
| Citation | 669 So.2d 1233 |
| Parties | 95 1936 La.App. 1 Cir |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
28 cases
-
State v. Bourgeois
...Landiak, 899 So. 2d at 543-44. Domicile is therefore determined on a case-by-case basis. See Rattan v. Fields, 95-1936 (La. App. 1 Cir. 9/26/95), 669 So. 2d 1233, 1238 (en banc, per curiam ), writs denied , 95-2381, (La. 9/29/950), 661 So.2d 1342, 95–2382 (La. 9/29/95), 661 So. 2d 1341.Dete......
-
In re Interdiction of Watts
... ... However, the threshold issue is one of venue.1 ... APPLICABLE LAW ... Louisiana ... 484, 56 So.2d 844, 846 (1951); Pattan v. Fields, 95-1936, p. 8 (La.App. 1 Cir ... ...
-
96 0194 La.App. 1 Cir. 11/8/96, Guidry v. Dufrene
...if the plaintiff has a right or legal interest in the subject matter of the suit. Pattan v. Fields, 95-1936 (La.App. 1 Cir. 9/26/95); 669 So.2d 1233, writs denied, [96 0194 La.App. 1 Cir. 4] 95-2382 (La. 9/29/95); 661 So.2d 1341; 95-2381 (La. 9/29/95); 661 So.2d To assert an action, a plain......
-
Walsh v. Rogillio
...as to promote rather than defeat candidacy. Bailey v. Bolton, 98-2026 (La.App. 1 Cir. 9/10/98), 755 So.2d 254; Pattan v. Fields, 95-1936 (La.App. 1 Cir. 9/26/95), 669 So.2d 1233, writs denied, 95-2381, 95-2382 (La.9/29/95), 661 So.2d 1341, 1342. This means that doubts as to the qualificatio......
Request a trial to view additional results