U.S. v. Wright

Decision Date26 March 1992
Docket NumberNo. 91-2780,91-2780
Citation957 F.2d 520
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. William Hurd WRIGHT, Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Mark J. Cero, St. Louis, Mo., argued, for appellant.

Richard Lee Poehling, St. Louis, Mo., argued, for appellee.

Before FAGG, BOWMAN and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

FAGG, Circuit Judge.

William Hurd Wright pleaded guilty to robbery of a federally insured savings and loan association in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). At sentencing Wright stipulated he took money from the savings and loan by using intimidation. Wright carried no weapon and did not use force or violence. Wright simply approached the bank teller and softly said, "This is a robbery, give me your money." Finding this statement was at least an implied threat to use force, the district court held the robbery was a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2. Accordingly, the district court sentenced Wright as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. Wright appeals his sentence, contending the robbery was not a crime of violence. We affirm.

Although Wright stipulated he committed robbery by intimidation, Wright asserts we should examine the facts underlying the robbery to determine whether it is a crime of violence. We believe the guidelines require a legal approach rather than a factual approach in Wright's case. The Sentencing Commission defines "crime of violence" in two ways:

The term "crime of violence" means any offense under federal or state law punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year that--

(i) has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against [another person], or

(ii) is burglary of a dwelling, arson, or extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.

U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(1) (Nov.1990).

We conclude Wright's robbery is a crime of violence under subsection (i). To obtain a conviction for robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), the Government must show the defendant took property "by force and violence, or by intimidation." "Intimidation means the threat of force." United States v. Jones, 932 F.2d 624, 625 (7th Cir.1991); see United States v. Selfa, 918 F.2d 749, 751 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 521, 112 L.Ed.2d 532 (1990). Because use or threatened use of force is an element of robbery, a person convicted of robbery has been convicted of a crime of violence. United States v. Wilson, 951 F.2d 586, 588 (4th Cir.1991); Jones, 932 F.2d at 625; United States v. McAllister, 927 F.2d 136, 138 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 111, 116 L.Ed.2d 80 (1991); Selfa, 918 F.2d at 751; United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 911 F.2d 542, 548 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2056, 114 L.Ed.2d 461 (1991). The guideline note's statement that " '[c]rime of violence' includes ... robbery" supports our view. U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 n. 2. We thus join the circuits that have held robbery is a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(1)(i). Wilson, 951 F.2d at 588; Jones, 932 F.2d at 625; McAllister, 927 F.2d at 139; Gonzalez-Lopez, 911 F.2d at 547-48.

When deciding whether an offense is a crime of violence under subsection (i), courts must focus their inquiry on the elements of the offense rather than the facts underlying the offense. Wilson, 951 F.2d at 588; Gonzalez-Lopez, 911 F.2d at 547. Courts can examine an offense's underlying facts only when "that offense can be committed without violence within the meaning of section 4B1.1" Jones, 932 F.2d at 625. Because robbery cannot be committed without violence within the meaning of section 4B1.1, courts cannot examine the facts underlying each robbery. Wilson, 951 F.2d at 588; United States v. John, 936 F.2d 764, 767 (3d Cir.1991); Jones, 932 F.2d at 625; Selfa, 918 F.2d at 751; Gonzalez-Lopez, 911 F.2d at 547; see also Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 2158-60, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990). In contrast, when deciding whether an offense "involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another" under subsection (ii), courts may examine the facts underlying the defendant's conviction to determine whether the offense is a crime of violence. John, 936 F.2d at 770. Thus, our decision today is consistent with United States v. Cornelius, 931 F.2d 490, 493 (8th Cir.1991) (using factual approach to determine whether...

To continue reading

Request your trial
46 cases
  • Arnold v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Arizona
    • January 20, 2022
    ... ... decision of the Supreme Court.” United States v ... Harper , 869 F.3d 624, 626 (2017) (citing United ... States v. Wright , 957 F.2d 520 (8th Cir. 1992)). The ... Eighth Circuit disagreed with the defendant-appellant's ... argument that Elonis had abrogated ... Sotomayor's concurring opinion in Beckles that ... the question remains open before the Court, it is not for us ... to declare anything to the contrary.” Recently, the ... D.C. Circuit “departed” from the approach adopted ... by the ... ...
  • U.S. v. Flores, CR01-3052-MWB.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • September 11, 2002
    ...to commit such an act under circumstances raising a reasonable expectation that the threat will be carried out"); United States v. Wright, 957 F.2d 520, 521 (8th Cir.1992) (noting that "[c]ourts must focus their inquiry on the elements of the offense rather than the facts underlying the off......
  • Matter of Alcantar
    • United States
    • U.S. DOJ Board of Immigration Appeals
    • May 25, 1994
    ...prior to 1991 amendment, citing commentary as authority to consider underlying facts; policy questioned in dissent) and United States v. Wright, 957 F.2d 520 (8th Cir.) (subsequent to 1991 amendment continuing to allow examination of the facts underlying a conviction when deciding whether a......
  • United States v. Evans
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • May 8, 2019
    ...848 F.3d 711, 715–16 (5th Cir. 2017) (same); United States v. McBride , 826 F.3d 293, 296 (6th Cir. 2016) (same); United States v. Wright , 957 F.2d 520, 521–22 (8th Cir. 1992) (same); United States v. Jones , 932 F.2d 624, 625 (7th Cir. 1991) (same); United States v. Gutierrez , 876 F.3d 1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT