Klassen v. Quinlan, 91-5172

Decision Date21 May 1992
Docket NumberNo. 91-5172,91-5172
Citation966 F.2d 702
PartiesNOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. Ben KLASSEN, et al., Rudolph Stanko, Appellant, v. Michael QUINLAN, individually and in his capacity as Director of the Bureau of Prisons, et al.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit

Before WALD, STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellees' motion for summary affirmance and the response thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion be granted substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum opinion filed April 30, 1991. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980). The court correctly ruled that venue is lacking. See 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) (1991).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT