Wingert v. State

Decision Date22 June 1916
Docket Number10.
Citation98 A. 224,129 Md. 28
PartiesWINGERT et al. v. STATE.
CourtMaryland Court of Appeals

Appeal from Orphans' Court, Washington County.

"To be officially reported."

Proceedings for the purpose of fixing and ascertaining the collateral inheritance tax to be charged against the real estate of P Hager Wingert, deceased. From an order of the orphans' court of Washington county overruling certain objections and exceptions to the inventory and appraisement, Henry F Wingert and others appeal. Affirmed.

Argued before BOYD, C.J., and BRISCOE, BURKE, THOMAS, PATTISON URNER, and CONSTABLE, JJ.

Harvey R. Spessard and H. F. Wingert, both of Hagerstown (Miller Wingert, of Hagerstown, on the brief), for appellants. Albert C. Ritchie, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRISCOE J.

This is the third appeal in this case. The first will be found reported in Wingert v. State, 125 Md. 536, 94 A 166, and the second in Wingert v. Albert et al., 127 Md. 80, 95 A. 1055. The appeal now before us is from an order of the orphans' court of Washington county, overruling certain objections and exceptions to the inventory and appraisement of the real estate of P. Hager Wingert, deceased, for the purpose of fixing and ascertaining the collateral inheritance tax to be charged, for the use of the state against the real estate, of the intestate, and which was returned to the orphans' court of that county. The exceptions are filed by the brothers and sisters of the deceased, his only heirs at law, and the objections to the valuation of the real estate are stated to be as follows: First. For that the inventory and appraisement of the real estate of P. Hager Wingert, deceased, as returned to the orphans' court of Washington county, is not a true and perfect inventory of the real estate of P. Hager Wingert, deceased. Second. For that the values placed upon the real estate of P. Hager Wingert, deceased, by the appraisers of the real estate of said deceased and returned to the orphans' court of Washington county, are not the true and correct values of the real estate of P. Hager Wingert, deceased, in that the appraisement shows that the whole of the properties owned by the Wingert heirs was appraised instead of the undivided one-seventh interest owned by the said P. Hager Wingert, deceased, during his lifetime. The orphans' court, after a hearing, overruled the appellants' exceptions, approved the return, and directed it to be recorded, and it is from this order that an appeal has been taken.

The single question presented by the record is whether the appraisers adopted the proper method of valuation of an undivided one-seventh interest in certain real estate, owned by P. Hager Wingert, deceased, for the purpose of assessing the collateral inheritance tax, chargeable thereon, for the use of the state.

The conceded facts of the case, briefly stated, are these: After the decision of this court on the former appeals, the orphans' court of Washington county appointed new appraisers to value the real estate of the deceased, for the purpose of the inheritance tax, and on the 21st of January, 1916, they made an inventory and assessed the valuation of his real estate, at the sum of $33,357.97, and this appraisement was subsequently returned to the orphans' court, by the administrators of the estate, as required by law.

The real estate of the decedent consisted of an undivided one-seventh interest in city property, situate in Hagerstown Md., and in farms, located in Washington county. The property was owned by the deceased, in common with six brothers and sisters, his only heirs at law, and each held an undivided one-seventh interest therein. The real estate was valued as a whole at the sum of $233,505.83, and this valuation was divided by seven, and the result fixed and returned by the appraisers, on the basis and value of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Rosenburg v. Bouse, for Use of State
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • 25 Mayo 1937
    ...a beneficiary under the will. State v. Dalrymple, 70 Md. 294, 299, 17 A. 82, 3 L.R.A. 372; Tyson v. State, 28 Md. 577; Wingert v. State, 129 Md. 28, 30, 98 A. 224; Fisher v. State, 106 Md. 104, 119, 66 A. Washington Hospital Ass'n v. Mealey's Estate, 121 Md. 274, 280, 88 A. 136, 140, 48 L.R......
  • Textor v. Textor
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • 19 Febrero 1936
    ... ... Code, ... art. 81, §§ 124-145, 1929 Supp. art. 81, §§ 105, 130; Bagby ... on Executors and Admrs. §§ 87, 65; Helser v. State, ... 128 Md. 228, 232, 233, 97 A. 539; Wingert v. State, ... 129 Md. 28, 30, 31, 98 A. 224; Safe Deposit & Trust Co ... v. State, 143 Md ... ...
  • State v. Wingert
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • 11 Abril 1918
  • Wingert v. State
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • 29 Enero 1918
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT