Fitzpatrick v. People of State
| Decision Date | 21 March 1881 |
| Parties | FRANK FITZPATRICKv.THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. |
| Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERECRIMINAL LAW-- of the arraignment.
The mention in the record of a criminal prosecution, of the prisoner's presence in court, and that he was called upon to plead to the indictment, and pleaded not guilty, shows sufficiently an arraignment, under our practice. The ancient formality is disused in our practice. The furnishing of a copy of the indictment will answer the purpose of reading the same to the defendant.
WRIT OF ERROR to the Circuit Court of McLean county; the Hon. OWEN T. REEVES, Judge, presiding.
Messrs. STEVENSON & EWING, for the plaintiff in error:
The judgment must be reversed for the reason the record fails to show that the accused was arraigned on the indictment. Rev. Stat. 1845, p. 300, sec. 3; Bouv. Law Dic. p. 126; Arch. Cr. 1070, and note; Schirmer v. People, 33 Ill. 276, Johnson v. People, 22 Id. 314.
Mr. ROBERT B. PORTER, State's attorney, for the People:
As to what constitutes an arraignment, see Burrill's Law Dic.; Coke's Litt. 263a; Bouv. Law Dic.; 1 Archb. 350, side p. 108; Wharton's Law Dic.
The record shows that the defendant was called on to plead and did plead, and that is substantially an arraignment.
This was an indictment for malicious mischief, whereon the defendant was found guilty, and sentenced to one year's imprisonment in the penitentiary.
He assigns for error that the record fails to show that he was arraigned on the indictment. The record, after reciting the coming of the defendant in custody of the sheriff, and the disposition of a motion made by his attorney to quash the indictment, proceeds: “And now the defendant being called upon to plead thereto, says that he is not guilty,” etc.
Our statute (Rev. Stat. 1874, p. 410, sec. 3,) provides: “Upon the arraignment of a prisoner it shall be sufficient, without complying with any other form, to declare orally that he is not guilty, and the mention of the arraignment and such plea shall constitute the issue between the people of the State and the prisoner.”
Blackstone says: “To arraign is nothing else but to call the prisoner to the bar of the court to answer the matter charged upon him in the indictment.” 4 Black. Com. 322. Though he remarks further, that, when brought to the bar, the prisoner is to be called upon by name to hold up his...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. O'Kelley
...did not, in the opinion of the Supreme Court, prejudice the substantial rights of the defendant.' R. S. 1881, § 1891." And in Fitzpatrick v. People, 98 Ill. 259, and Spicer v. People, 11 Ill. App. 294, it was held that announcing ready for trial is equivalent to a plea of not guilty. It was......
-
The State v. Fitch
...not, in the opinion of the Supreme Court, prejudice the substantial rights of the defendant.' [R. S. 1881, sec. 1891.]" And in Fitzpatrick v. People, 98 Ill. 259, and v. People, 11 Ill.App. 294, it was held that announcing ready for trial is equivalent to a plea of not guilty. It was held t......
-
State v. O'Kelley
... ... irregularity, for which, no other reasons appearing, judgment ... would not be set aside. Spicer v. People, 11 Ill.App. 294 ... (Bradw.) ... STURGIS, ... J. Robertson, P. J., concurs. Farrington, J., dissents and ... files separate ... being entered orally by counsel and this has been ... sanctioned by the Supreme Court." [Fitzpatrick v ... People, etc., 98 Ill. 259.] ... ... "Where defendant announces himself ready for ... trial he in effect enters a plea ... ...
-
State v. O'Kelley
... ... It has been held that this is error, even in case of a misdemeanor. Hoskins v. People, 84 Ill. 87, 25 Am. Rep. 433; Gould v. People, 89 Ill. 216. But, if this were the only point in the case, we should be inclined to hold upon the ... Fitzpatrick v. People, etc., 98 Ill. 259." ... Where defendant announces himself ready for trial, he in effect enters a plea, and the failure ... ...