U.S. v. Oratokhai, 92-3038

• Decision Date: 15 December 1992
• Docket Number: No. 92-3038,92-3038
• Citation: 983 F.2d 298
• Parties: NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. UNITED STATES of America v. Joseph ORATOKHAI, Appellant.
• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit

Page 298

983 F.2d 298

299 U.S.App.D.C. 273

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

UNITED STATES of America v. Joseph ORATOKHAI, Appellant.

No. 92-3038.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Dec. 15, 1992.

Before HARRY T. EDWARDS, BUCKLEY and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties and arguments by counsel. After full review of the case, the court is satisfied that appropriate disposition of the appeal does not warrant an opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the conviction be affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15(b)(2).