989 F.2d 493 (4th Cir. 1993), 92-1763, Loos v. City of Concord, N.C.
|Citation:||989 F.2d 493|
|Party Name:||Bernie E. LOOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, and 2649 35 5 W. Allen Overcash; Larry E. Stancil, Jr.; J. M. Stegall; Brian E. Voncannon; Hilton Grady Smith, Jr.; Jimmy A. Maner, Jr.; Ronald E. Barbee; Mark J. Davis; Tim R. Templeton; LLrry F. Ketchie; Joseph O'Donnell; Francis L. Bishop; Keith E. Cauthan; Scott Newell; Ramona O. Page; Douglas W. Small; Mich|
|Case Date:||March 10, 1993|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit|
This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA4 Rule 36 regarding use of unpublished opinions)
Argued: February 4, 1993
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CA-91-631-4)
Louis L. Lesesne, Jr., LESESNE & CONNETTE, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant.
David Betts Hamilton, PETREE, STOCKTON, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Penni P. Bradshaw, Louis W. Doherty, PETREE, STOCKTON, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
J. Michael McGuinness, MCGUINNESS & PARLAGRECO, Salem, Massachusetts, for Amici Curiae.
Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PAYNE, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.
Bernie E. Loos sought, by motion for a mandatory preliminary injunction, to compel the City of Concord to reinstate him to his job as a police sergeant pending the outcome of the underlying litigation. The district court denied the motion, and Loos appeals.
On December 30, 1991, after an...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP