Columbia Gas Systems Inc., In re
| Decision Date | 06 July 1993 |
| Docket Number | No. 92-7412,No. 92-7400,No. 92-7436,No. 92-7413,No. 92-7414,No. 92-7411,No. 92-7399,No. 92-7395,No. 92-7396,O,No. 92-7500,No. 92-7398,No. 92-7397,Nos. 92-7395,No. 92-7435,No. 92-7499,No. 92-7415,No. 92-7410,92-7395,92-7396,92-7397,92-7398,92-7399,92-7400,92-7410,92-7411,92-7412,92-7413,92-7414,92-7415,92-7435,92-7436,92-7499,92-7500,s. 92-7395 |
| Citation | 997 F.2d 1039 |
| Parties | , 29 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 606, 144 P.U.R.4th 414, Util. L. Rep. P 13,945, Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,337 In re COLUMBIA GAS SYSTEMS INC.; Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation. The OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF the COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION v. COLUMBIA GAS SYSTEMS INC.; Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Thomas E. Ross, Trustee, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, Intervenor-Defendant, Meridian Oil Production Inc. ("Meridian Oil"), Intervenor in Support of Appellees, Maryland Office of People's Counsel ("MPC"), Intervenor in Support of Appellants, Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate (Pa. OCA), Intervenor in Support of Appellees, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.; Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corporation; New York State Electric and Gas Corporation; National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation, Intervenors in Support of Official Committee of Customers of the Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Columbia Gas Distribution Companies, Intervenors in Support of Appellants, Ozark Gas Transmission System, a Texas General Partnership (the "Partnership") and its Subsidiary, Ozark Finance Corporation (the "Company"), Intervenors in Support of Appellants, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Intervenors in Support of Appellants, Official Committee of Customers ("Customer Committee") of Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation ("TCo"), Intervenor in Support of Appellants, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission; Maryland Public Service Commission; Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Intervenors in Support of Appellants, Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Intervenor in Support of Appellants, Delmarva Power & Light Company ("Delmarva"); the Providence Gas Company ("Providence"), Intervenors in Support of Appellants, Office of People's Counsel for the District of Columbia (OPC), Intervenor in Support of Appellants, Office of the Consumers' Counsel, State of Ohio (OCC), Intervenor in Support of Appellees, G |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
To continue reading
Request your trial
153 cases
-
In re Foos
... ... William HAELING; Saul Foos; Marc Michaels Interior Design, Inc., a Florida corporation; Addison Development Group, Inc., a Florida corporation; New Venture, a ... Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. Columbia Gas Systems, Inc. (In re Columbia Gas Systems, Inc.), 997 F.2d ... ...
- Fed. Deposit Ins., Corp. v. Fbop Corp., Case No. 14 CV 4307, Case No. 14 CV 4307.
- Revock v. Cowpet Bay W. Condo. Ass'n
- Solis v. Koresko
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Who Owns Digital Assets When A Cryptocurrency Platform Files Bankruptcy? The Terms Of Use Answer The Question
...Corp.), 874 F.2d 88, 93 (2d Cir. 1989); Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. Columbia Gas Sys., Inc. (In re Columbia Gas Sys., Inc.), 997 F.2d 1039, 1059 (3d Cir. 1993) ("Congress clearly intended the exclusion created by section 541(d) to include not only funds held in express trust, b......
2 books & journal articles
-
Frederick J. Glasgow Iii, Reclaiming the Defenses to Reclamation
...note 40, at 1, 3-4. 96 Kimbell Foods, 440 U.S. at 740; Wilson v. Omaha Indian Tribe, 442 U.S. 653, 672 (1979); In re Columbia Gas Sys., 997 F.2d 1039, 1055 (3d. Cir. 1993); Mabey, supra note 40, at 1, 3-4. 97 United States v. Stump Home Specialties Mfg., Inc., 905 F.2d 1117, 1119 (7th Cir. ......
-
CHAPTER 4 OPERATIONAL ISSUES IN TIMES OF DISTRESS
...[25] See, e.g., In re Columbia Gas Sys. Inc., 136 B.R. 930, 934 (Bankr. D. Del. 1992), aff'd in part and rev'd in part, 997 F.2d 1039 (3d Cir. 1993).[26] See, e.g., In re Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc., 124 B.R. 1021, 1023 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1991); see also In re Just for Feet, Inc., 242 B.R. 821......