Bluemile, Inc. v. Atlas Industrial Contractors, Ltd., 022514 OHCP, 12 CV 5597
|Docket Nº:||12 CV 5597, 12 CV 5768|
|Opinion Judge:||MCINTOSH, J.|
|Party Name:||BLUEMILE, INC., Plaintiff, v. ATLAS INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTORS, LTD., et al., Defendants. ATLAS INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTORS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. BLUEMILE, INC, et al., Defendants|
|Case Date:||February 25, 2014|
|Court:||Court of Common Pleas of Ohio|
DECISION AND ENTRY DENYING DEFENDANT HARTFORD CASAULTY INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF BLUEMILE, INC.'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DECLARATORY RELIEF
This matter is before the Court on Motion by Defendant Hartford Casualty Insurance Company for Summary Judgment and Motion by Plaintiff Bluemile, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment and Declaratory Relief, both filed September 23, 2013. The motions have been fully briefed and the parties appeared before the Court for a hearing on the matter on November 18, 2013. Upon review and for the following reasons, the Court finds in favor of plaintiff and against defendant.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
The underlying facts are not in dispute. Bluemile, Inc. (" Bluemile") provides cloud, network, data hosting, and phone services. On February 10, 2011, Bluemile suffered an outage that caused a disruption in services from 7:36 a.m. to 9:45 a.m. Bluemile alleges in its Complaint that it suffered damages in excess of $7, 000, 000.
At all times relevant, Bluemile had an insurance policy with Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (" Hartford"), which provided Business Income and Extended Business Income (" EBI") coverage. Hartford paid Bluemile $514, 898 toward its claim for Business Income coverage. However, the parties dispute the length of time for EBI Coverage, which is the sole issue before the Court at this time.
The EBI language in Bluemile's policy states:
Extended Business Income
We will pay for the actual loss of Business Income you incur during the period that: (1) Begins on the date property is actually repaired, rebuilt or replaced and " operations" are resume; and (2) Ends on the earlier of: a. The date you could restore your " operations" with reasonable speed, to the condition that would have existed if no direct physical loss or physical damage occurred; or b. 90 consecutive days after the date determined in (a) above.
The parties' dispute arises from the language in subsection 2(b). Bluemile argues that subsection 2(a) governs the length of EBI coverage, while Hartford suggests that there is a typographical error in subsection 2(b) and the length of time is 90 days from the date of repair. Bluemile and Hartford now move for summary judgment.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
In order to prevail upon a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must inform the court of the basis for the motion and identify those portions of the...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP