Duncan v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., 112012 FED9, 11-17033
|Party Name:||DAWN J. DUNCAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC.; NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees.|
|Judge Panel:||Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.|
|Case Date:||November 20, 2012|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit|
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Submitted November 13, 2012[**]
Appeal from the United States District Court No. 2:11-cv-00864-JCM-PAL for the District of Nevada James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding.
Dawn J. Duncan appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing her diversity action arising from foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1072 (9th Cir. 2005), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Duncan's action because Duncan failed to allege facts sufficient to show that the notice and guide regarding a short sale option constituted an enforceable contract. See May v. Anderson, 119 P.3d 1254, 1257 (Nev. 2005) ("Basic contract principles require, for an enforceable contract, an offer and acceptance, meeting of the minds, and...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP